The thesis does not meet the criteria for a satisfactory thesis below.
Knowledge and skills in the field and ability to understand and evaluate them: The thesis has utilized the most important sources and concepts in the field of research and/or development, relevant and reliable sources of information, which are mainly properly expressed, albeit partially inadequately. The knowledge base of the work has only had the most significant impact on the choices made in the implementation process.
Research and development competence: The subject matter, research and/or development function and/or question has been asked, is in principle feasible and is linked to the knowledge base of the work. The topic, the research and/or development function and/or the question is justified from the viewpoint of the author's competence and/or work development. Working, development and/or research methods are appropriate and suitable for the task and objectives, although they are lacking.
Knowledge of self-development: The defined objectives are linked to the competence of their authors/factors and support development, although there are shortcomings. The work has included an evaluation and is also reflected in the thesis report, although it is scarce.
Organisational and co-operation competence: The thesis has been carried out in dialogue situations, has been listened to, asked forward questions and reasoned views, although there have been shortcomings. In the thesis, expert assistance has been acquired and used only in the most relevant stages of the development process, and more attention could have been paid to this. Communication in different phases of the thesis has been planned and the development project and its results have been communicated in guided ways, although some communication has been incomplete. In writing and speaking, communication has mainly been understandable, factual and clear.
Ethical competence: Sources have been used and labelled in accordance with the guidelines of the Turku University of Applied Sciences / the international method of marking their own field in accordance with their main features and in accordance with the method of implementation of the thesis, but in part inadequately. The reliability, completeness and applicability of development activities have been assessed, although they have been deficient. The thesis has followed professional ethical guidelines and good scientific practice in its own field, but only in the most relevant respects. The thesis takes into account the views of different actors, at least in some respects.
Knowledge and skills in the field and ability to understand and evaluate them: The thesis has applied the current domestic and international concepts of the field and the source material in a systematic, justified and critical way. The solutions and methodological choices made are based on the knowledge base.
Research and development competence: The research and/or development function is based on the need of the sponsor, (work) community or target group. The subject matter, the research and development task is limited, formulated and justified in a feasible and understandable way. The thesis has applied recent working, development and/or research methods in the field, which are linked to the objectives. Methodological choices are justified. The plan has been drawn up with the sponsor and/or other partners, taking into account their wishes, needs and contributions. The work has progressed responsibly, systematically and in a controlled manner; it has made sound solutions that take account of the needs and feedback that have emerged during the process.
The thesis presents ideas, solutions and/or a product that responds to the defined mission and target definition. The results and/or the product are presented in a precise, well-founded manner and highlighting the potential for recovery. Work, results and output have been assessed in a diverse way, taking into account the knowledge base.
Self-development competence: Authors/factors have set/set the objectives of professional development and have demonstrated/showed how the thesis serves their achievement. The development of knowledge and the achievement of objectives, activities and expertise have been re-examined, and observations and insights have been utilised in directing their own activities.
Organisational and co-operation competence: The thesis has been carried out with a network of partners formed from the needy partners. The (communication) plan of the thesis has been modified as necessary, as the situation requires, and has been addressed as the process progresses to the emerging communication needs and opportunities. The communication included in the thesis takes into account the guidelines and the different needs and policies of the target groups and individuals. Information and communication technology used in the thesis in meaningful ways when communicating development work.
Ethical competence: Sources have been used and labelled in accordance with Turku University of Applied Sciences' guidelines / international method of marking in their field. The thesis has solved ethical challenges related to development, documentation and communication in a professional and responsible way. The reliability, coverage and applicability of the development activities have been assessed on the basis of the criteria.
The ethical nature of one's own actions has been deflated during and at the end of the process
Knowledge and skills in the field and ability to understand and evaluate them: The thesis has been critically evaluated, applied and developed in the field of development, as well as the related domestic and international concepts of the field and research data. The thesis combines and utilises research data and professional competence in a way that supports the development of innovative solutions.
Research and development competence: The topic, research and/or development function, research issue and objectives are new creative in their own operating environment. The subject matter, the research and/or development function, the research issue and the objectives have been linked to the knowledge base, presented clearly, structuredly and on a diverse basis. Methodical solutions are new creative. Research and development is systematic, knowledge-based and critical. The plan is innovative, developing expertise and working life. The thesis is based on the current and relevant development challenge of its own field and responds responsibly, creatively and innovatively to the development task. The work has been goal-oriented, committed, independent and constructive throughout. The results have been presented in a clear, structured and diverse manner, and are linked to the knowledge base. The thesis has produced new content, knowledge and/or practices in the field that can be utilised. Reliability and innovation have also been demonstrated and justified. Work, results and output have been critically evaluated, showing new development targets.
Self-development competence: The author/factors of the thesis have/have worked/worked in a self-directed, goal-oriented, responsible and reflexive manner, leading and supporting their own work and working group. Expertise, critical development and development will be transmitted.
Organisational and co-operation competence: The thesis has been carried out in a systematic way, building and maintaining interaction between the industry and its partners. The thesis has utilised and applied domestic and international knowledge and expertise relevant to its own development project. The thesis has been carried out constructively in multidisciplinary, multicultural and/or international networks. The thesis and the thesis have been communicated in a guided and appropriate way to the Finnish networks in their field. The thesis has also included communication and communication in international networks.The communication and work included in the thesis take into account the communication situation, the type of text, the guidelines, the different needs and practices of the target groups and individuals. As the work progresses, the message has been spoken and written in an illustrative and expert manner.
Ethical competence: Sources have been used and labelled in accordance with Turku University of Applied Sciences' guidelines / international method of marking in their field. The thesis has solved ethical challenges related to development, documentation and communication in a professional and responsible way. The reliability, coverage and applicability of the development activities have been assessed on the basis of the criteria.
The ethical nature of one's own actions has been reflected during and at the end of the process.
Study guide