Study Guide

Objective

After completing the course, the student is able to:
- Understand the design thinking process as an iterative way of working
- Perceive the possibilities that service design thinking enables as a holistic, interdisciplinary and innovative approach to service development
- Comprehend the importance of empathy and user-oriented way of thinking

Content

- Approach and applicability of design thinking
- Innovation
- Empathy
- User-orientation
- Maturity levels of design thinking
- Service design process models
- Convergent and divergent thinking
- Current topics of service design

Materials

Pre-assignment:

Clatworthy, S. 2017. Service design thinking.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322733238_Service_design_thinking

Articles of design thinking and service design thinking:

Beckman, S.L. 2020. To Frame of Reframe: Where Might Design Thinking Research Go Next? https://escholarship.org/content/qt5zx787h7/qt5zx787h7.pdf

Dam, R www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/design-thinking-getting-started-with-empathy

Dam, R. F. & Siang, T. Y. 2021. Five Stages in the Design Thinking Process.
https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/5-stages-in-the-design-thinking-process

Doctorius. 2018. Learning Design Thinking at Stanford?University.
https://doctorious.org/2018/08/15/learning-design-thinking-at-stanford-university/

Gloppen, J. 2009. Service Design Leadership. http://www.ep.liu.se/ecp/059/007/ecp09059007.pdf

Naiman, L. 2019. Design Thinking as a Strategy for Innovation. https://www.creativityatwork.com/design-thinking-strategy-for-innovation/?amp

Plattner, H. (w.y.) An Introduction to Design Thinking PROCESS GUIDE. http://web.stanford.edu/~mshanks/MichaelShanks/files/509554.pdf

van Reine, P. P. 2017. The Culture of Design Thinking for Innovation. https://journalsojs3.fe.up.pt/index.php/jim/article/view/2183-0606_005.002_0006/281

Wright, N. 2020. Principles for Designing Sustainable Services. https://medium.com/wearesnook/principles-for-designing-sustainable-services-bbf3f3948ac2

Literature of design thinking and service design thinking:

Brown, T. 2019. Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation. Harper Business.

Luchs, M.G, Swan, K.S & Griffin, A. (eds). 2016. Design Thinking. New Product Development Essentials from the PDMA. Wiley.

Miettinen, S. 2014.?Muotoiluajattelu.?Teknova.

Stickdorn, M. & Schneider, J. 2011. This is Service Design Thinking. BIS Publishers.

Stickdorn, M.,?Hormess, M.E. & Lawrence, A. 2018. This Is Service Design Doing: Applying Service Design Thinking in the Real World. O’Reilly Media. USA.

Tuulaniemi, J. 2011, 2013.?Palvelumuotoilu.?Talentum.

Van Patter, G.K., Pastor, E. & Jones, P. 2020 Rethinking Design Thinking: Making Sense of the Future That Has Already Arrived. Humantific & NextDesign Leadership Network.

Teaching methods

Working methods:
Lectures, workshops, teamwork and presentations.
Reflective thinking and writing.

Exam schedules

Final assignment (reflection paper) by 17.10.2021.

Overdue assignments shall be returned by 30.11.2021 or 31.12.2021.

International connections

The course is based on innovation pedagogy and constructivism, reflective, inquiry-based, and experiential learning. The student group is international.

Completion alternatives

According to the principles for credit transfer.

Student workload

Workload approximately 135 h:
- Contact sessions ca 20 h
- Distance studies 115 h

Pre-assignment 8 h
Preparing for, participating in and reflecting on the contact sessions and exercises 50 h
Reading articles and writing the reflection paper 75 h
Self-assessment 2 h

Content scheduling

Content of study unit
- Approach and applicability of design thinking
- Empathy
- User-orientation
- Innovation
- Service design process models
- Sustainability in service development
- Current topics of service design

Start 4.9.2021 – Submission of final assignment 26.10.2021

Contact sessions:

Saturday 4.9.2021 8.30 – 12.00
Friday 17.9.2021 at 13.00 – 16.15
Saturday 18.9.2021 at 8.30 – 12.00
Friday 8.10.2021 at 8.30 – 12.00
Saturday 9.10.2021 at 8.30 – 12.00

Further information

The contact lessons are in Novia´s Campus Åbo, Henrikinkatu 7

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment methods and criteria

Course Assignments:

1. Pre-assignment to be completed during summer 2021:
Read the following article and make notes on different aspects of service design thinking:
Clatworthy, S. 2017. Service design thinking.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322733238_Service_design_thinking

2. Finishing and returning exercises from workshops from the contact sessions.

3. Self-assessment of one’s own participation in the lessons and workshops during the contact days.

4. Individual reflection paper, ca 8-10 pages (excluding title page, table of contents, reference list), based on articles and course materials. Create a heading based on the contents.

Aims:
- To raise the students’ awareness of the possibilities of design thinking and service design.
- To reflect on design thinking and service design as a process and way of working.

Criteria for assessment:
1. Active participation in lessons and workshops during the contact days.
2. Versatile processing of the topic in the reflection paper:
- understanding and discussion of the topics and the concepts
- reflection of theory to own career and experiences in working life
- reflection of the possibilities of adapting design thinking in own workin the future

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

- Quantity: the work is not completed and or;
- Quality: the minimum content requirements are not met

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

1 Sufficient
- Ability to reflect and communicate are hardly acceptable

2 Satisfactory
-Ability to reflect and communicate are on an acceptable level
-Appears to grasp the theory

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

3 Good
- Capacity of thinking and ability to communicate are good
- Shows good understanding and reflection of theory

4 Very good
- Capacity of thinking and ability to communicate are very good
- Shows very good understanding of the topics and reflection of theory

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

5 Excellent
-Mastery of theory and ability to open up one’s insights
-Outstanding thoughts and ability to communicate