Ship Diesel Electric Power Plants (5 cr)
Code: MS00BP27-3002
General information
- Enrollment
-
02.12.2021 - 31.01.2022
Registration for the implementation has ended.
- Timing
-
01.02.2022 - 10.05.2022
Implementation has ended.
- Number of ECTS credits allocated
- 5 cr
- Local portion
- 5 cr
- Mode of delivery
- Contact learning
- Unit
- Engineering and Business
- Campus
- Kupittaa Campus
- Teaching languages
- English
- Teachers
- Jari Lahtinen
- Course
- MS00BP27
Evaluation scale
H-5
Content scheduling
Contents: => See course content slides
January - April 2022
Objective
After completing the course, the student is able to:
• Analyse, why we should even consider electric propulsion.
• Recognize main components of diesel-electric machinery including main dimensions and weights.
• Go through the design process of machinery system, mainly on propulsion system.
• Is familiar with the details of major components such as main engine, transmission, propulsion, motors etc.
• Understands the economic aspects of diesel-electric machinery and the importance of operation profile.
Content
1. Why to consider electric propulsion for ship
2. Electric power train basics
3. Design flow on electric propulsion
4. Choice of power plant engines, properties and configurations
5. Choice of power transmission
6. Choice of propulsor
7. Choice of propulsion motor and their specific properties
8. Choice of main switchboard application and converter for propulsion motor control
9. Principles on economy of electric propulsion
10. Regulations, dimensioning and arrangement related aspect
Materials
Ships' electrical systems (book) and documents delivered during the course
Teaching methods
Learning by doing
Exam schedules
No exams
Pedagogic approaches and sustainable development
Team working and personal assignments
Completion alternatives
Proven equal knowledge studied elsewhere
Student workload
Problems, reports, design work documents.
5 ECTS = 135 working hours = 17 days = 3.4 weeks
Evaluation methods and criteria
Assessment is based on documents delivered by students:
1. Pre-assignment
2. Personal assignment
3. Team assignment
4. Personal problem solutions
Failed (0)
Student has no real effort to pass the course; assignments are are missing or they are not approved
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Minimum effort
Assessment criteria, good (3-4)
Well done
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Student has produced high-quality documents and indicates exellent knowledge of the topic
Further information
jari.lahtinen@turkuamk.fi