Study Guide

Objective

Students are familiar with the basics of human anatomy and physiology.
 

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

Students are familiar with the basics of human anatomy and physiology.
 

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

The student understands the importance of evidence-based activities and is able to utilize national and international sources of information. The student is able to interpret research using statistical methods.

The student is able to take sustainable development into account in his / her work and activities.

Content

- information retrieval
- source criticism
- source references
- presentation and number of statistics
- reading a scientific article

Ecological, economic, social and cultural aspects of sustainable development in clinical laboratory work and in our own activities.

Evaluation scale

Hyväksytty/Hylätty

Objective

The student is able
- to describe current challenges of population’s health and well-being as well as factors affecting them
- to describe the indicators of health and well-being as well as the meaning of knowledge when identifying and organizing services
- to describe social and health services organization and legislation
- to describe social security system,
- to search for information of social and health services to clients in different life situations
- to recognize the meaning of multiprofessionality in the perspective of service needs
- to act more securely and understand the responsibility for promoting security

Content

1. The status of the population’s health and well-being
- current challenges and factors affecting them
- promotion of health and functional ability, prevention of illnesses and accidents
- registers and statistics

2. Social and health services
- social and health care organization and development of it, funding, responsibilities, control/monitoring and client’s and patient’s rights
- social and health services
- income security
- searching information about social and health services and benefits

3. Security in social and health care

Evaluation scale

Hyväksytty/Hylätty

Objective

xx

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

The aim of the course is to activate and develop the students’ field-relevant English language and communication skills. The students will gain professional skills in various spoken and written communicative situations encountered in working life and society. In addition, they will learn to utilize tools and techniques to further develop their skills in authentic, field-specific contexts. More specifically, students will focus on developing their language and communication skills in.
Upon completing the course, the students should have acquired skills to communicate at level B2 according to European Framework of Reference for Languages, which states that at B2-level students should be able to produce clear, coherent and well-structured texts, present detailed descriptions related to one’s field of interest, express and exchange opinions using fluent language, follow complex arguments, and read longer articles and reports.

Content

- writing professional, field-specific texts
- presenting and discussing field-specific topics in a professional manner
- reading field-specific texts and utilizing the information in professional contexts
- learning and using key terminology of their field
- becoming professional, autonomous language users in working life

Materials

- Materials shared by the teacher.
- Materials searched from the web by the students.
- Materials produced by the students themselves.
- All materials will be available in the Itslearning learning environment. - No costs for the student.

Teaching methods

Face-to-face teaching (online teaching when needed), tasks done in class, independent work, pair/group work

International connections

- Work-life-oriented learning objectives and material
- Digital learning
- Independent work
- Group work and team learning
- Flipped learning
- Self-reflection
- Peer review

Student workload

3cr = 81h

Content scheduling

The aim of this course is to activate and develop the students’ field-relevant English language and communication skills. The students gain professional skills in various spoken and written communicative situations encountered in working life and society. In addition, they learn to utilize tools and techniques to further develop their skills in authentic, field-specific contexts.


Upon completing the course, the students have acquired sufficient skills to communicate at level B2 of the European Framework of Reference for Languages, which states that at level B2, students should be able to produce clear, coherent, and well-structured texts, present detailed descriptions related to their field of interest, express and exchange opinions using fluent language, follow complex argumentation, and read longer articles and reports.

- Writing professional, field-specific texts
- Presenting and discussing field-specific topics in a professional manner
- Reading field-specific texts and utilizing the information in professional contexts
- Learning and using key terminology of the field
- Becoming professional, autonomous language users in working life

Course topics:
• Personal learning goals and needs, language level, and professional profile
• Field-related topics such as the Finnish Health care system
• Reading and summarizing field-related material
• Professional vocabulary
• Self-reflection

- Group A 27.08.2024 10.30 – 14.30 ICT_C2025
Group B 29.8.2024 08.00-11.30 ICT_C2025
Lesson 1 – Course introduction + self-assessment

- 04.09.2024 09.30 - 13.30 EDU_2006_2007
Lesson 2 – Vocabulary building + Reading strategies

- 17.09.2024 09.00 - 13.00 ICT_C2025
Lesson 3 – Oral skills + professional language

- 25.09.2024 12.30 - 16.00 EDU_2027
Lesson 4 – Presentations

- 09.10.2024 13.00–15.00 EDU_2004 Exam

Further information

- Itslearning

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment methods and criteria

The course is graded on a scale of 0-5:

Course performances are scored, which will form the overall course grade. Both oral and written performances affect the grade. Some evaluated tasks are performed on campus, and some as independent work alone or in a group; see Itslearning for more detailed criteria.

Evaluation and feedback: Teacher’s feedback, task-specific points, self-reflection, peer feedback.

The course grade comprises as follows:
Compulsory attendance 75% No substitute tasks.
Exam: 30% - grading 0 to 5
Presentation: 30% - grading 0 to 5
Recording: 20% - PASS/FAIL
The remaining 20% are active in class participation and completing the assignments.

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

The student does not pass the course or has not completed the course tasks according to the instructions (e.g., use of artificial intelligence against the instructions). Course tasks are unreturned, or the course performance is incomplete.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Handling different topics in English in various professional situations is relatively narrow and one-sided. The produced text responds to the task inadequately and does not have a logical flow to it. The text contains some difficult-to-understand points. The language is satisfactory. Language use contains some structures and basic vocabulary; however, there are errors in their use. The student can speak moderately about the central topics of their field. The speech is not always easy to follow. There may be significant deficiencies in coherence and interaction. The language is quite simple and hesitant. However, the student can convey the message, even though errors in structure and pronunciation sometimes hinder understanding. There may be deficiencies in language positivity and course activity. The course tasks have been completed satisfactorily.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Handling the topic in English is versatile and, for the most part, corresponds to the given task in various professional situations. The language is structurally clear and logical. Oral and written output is fluent and clear. Structures and professional vocabulary are well-mastered. Some errors may occur. The student understands the English-language material of their field. Speech is logical and consistent. Interaction and reaction are mostly fluent and clear. The handling of the topic corresponds to the task and is suitable for different professional situations. The text proceeds moderately logically. Style errors may occur. Errors may occur in the most demanding structures and expressions. The student can speak well about various topics in their own field. The speech is easy to follow. The language is fluent, although some breaks and pronunciation errors may occur. In general, a language-positive attitude and active participation. There are no deficiencies in the course performance, and the tasks are done well.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Handling the topic in English is versatile and skilled, fully responding to the task in various professional situations. The text is structurally very clear and logical. Transitions are cohesively smooth. The student can convey the message naturally with an appropriate style. The language is very fluent and versatile. Structures are varied, and the professional vocabulary is extensive. Occasional errors may occur in the most demanding structures and expressions. The student can speak excellently about various topics in their own field. Speech is purposeful, very consistent, on-point, and logical. Transitions from one topic to another are very smooth. Interaction is very skilled, and non-verbal communication effectively supports speech. Language (speech, pronunciation, and intonation) is fluent, clear, precise, and normally paced. The course performance shows activity and language positivity, and the tasks have been performed excellently.

Objective

Students can report on their Bachelor’s thesis flawlessly both orally and in writing.
Students are able to have oral Presentation and Rapport.
Students have to pass The Maturity Test.
Students have to write Publication concerning Thesis Subject.

Content

The Report of the Thesis
Oral Presentation
Matural test

Evaluation scale

Hyväksytty/Hylätty

Objective

The student is able to act in a purposeful way in communicating and interacting in working life situations. He/she is able to take into consideration the receiver, the situation and the demands of the field and to communicate in an analytical, understandable and convincing manner.
The student is able and willing to develop his/her skills in the Finnish language and communication as part of his/her professional competence.

Content

Students know how to
-interpret the professional texts in their own field as part of information literacy skills and use their skills in new, different situations (for instance, text analysis and summary)
-write factual, consistent and understandable texts (for instance, small scale studies, reports, essays, professional presentations using source material) and to give references to sources according to given instructions (the basics of research communication)
-use up-to-date tools as support for their own linguistic ability in proof-reading (central contents in correcting language and text)
-act in a professional way in the verbal communication situations in working life, and to prepare for diverse speaking situations in a purposeful way (i.e. with the help of situation analysis and analysis plan)
-express themselves clearly using visual aids and by using language appropriate to the situation
-assess their own communication skills (the language and structure of spoken and written language, factors affecting readability and understandability, the effectiveness of the message)and to give and receive constructive criticism

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

Students
- can identify life-threatening situations and first aid needs
- are able to give the needed first aid
- are aware of the health care plans drawn up for exceptional situations.

Content

Students
- are familiar with normal microbes and their significance, and clinically important pathogens
- are aware of the different levels of aseptics and their requirements for the promotion of patient safety
- know how to work according to aseptic principles in the health care field.

Evaluation scale

Hyväksytty/Hylätty

Objective

Student is able to implement the thesis plan according to the principles of development work and research.

Content

raporttiluonnoksen esittäminen

Evaluation scale

Hyväksytty/Hylätty

Objective

 Student can describe
- envirornments of clinical radiography
-  legal and ethical basis for profession
- principles of radiation biology and radiation physics
- evidence based clinical radiography

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

Students is able to
-describe principles of safe and humane computed tomography (CT) procedures including contrast agents
-reason radiographer's action by evidence based.

Content

Content is described in the implementation plan.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

Student is able to
- describe the role and responsibility of radiographer in human and safe imaging guided interventions- describe the indications of various interventions- describe the imaging equipment used as well as the principle of fluoroscopy and ultrasound devices- apply knowledge of anatomy and physiology- view risk factorsand apply their security expertise- isearch, evaluate and use information regarding imaging guided interventions

Content

xx

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

Students is able to
- describe principles of safe and humane magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) procedures
- reason radiographer's action by evidence based.

Content

Content is described in the implementation plan.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

Student is able to
*descibe all types of medication used in clinical radiography and in emergency resuscitation
*describe risks of medication
*reason radiographer's action by evidence based

Content

Content is described in the implementation plan.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

Student is able to describe
- the principles of nuclear medicine
- radiopharmaceuticals and their use
- patient guidance in different phases of nuclear medicine examinations
- radiation protection and safety in nuclear medicine
Student is able to reason radiographer's action by evidence based.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

The student is able to describe
- special features of the patient centered care in clinical radiography
- methods to support patient's coping strategies
- the equipment to be used in imaging procedures and interventions
- principles of ergonomics
- cooperation with ward and ward as partner
 Student is able to reason radiographer's action by evidence based.
 

Content

Content is described in the implementation plan

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

Students  is able to describe
- principles of planning the different stages of radiotherapy in the patient’s chain of care and
- different kinds of implementation of radiotherapy
- the side effects of radiotherapy and methods to advise patients for the prevention and treatment of side effects
- the methods to support patient coping strategies
- safe procedures in the radiotherapy department
- cancer as a disease and different kind methods to cure cancer.
Student is able to reason radiographer's action by evidence based.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

Students  is able to
- describe principles of safe and humane plain x-ray imaging, mammography and  dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) procedures
- describe significance and criteria of screening
- to reason radiographer's action by evidence based.

Content

Content is described in the implementation plan.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

Students  is able to
- describe principles of safe and humane plain x-ray imaging, mammography and  dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) procedures
- describe significance and criteria of screening
- to reason radiographer's action by evidence based.

Content

Content is described in the implementation plan.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

Students can draft a viable plan for their Bachelor’s thesis.

Content

- Opinnäytetyön suunnitelman laatiminen

- Opinnäytetyön suunnitelman esittäminen

- Opinnäytetyön vertaisarviointi (opponointi)

Evaluation scale

Hyväksytty/Hylätty

Objective

The student is able to describe the content and characteristics of his/her future profession and the competence it will require.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

Student is able to
-plan, implement and evaluate clinical radiography procedures and services in authentic clinical environments (plain radiography, computed tomography, MRI, imaging quided interventios, nuclear medicine, radio therapy; expertice of radiography; Clinical placement of Erasmus Radiography Group Exhange Program)
-reason/justify his/her action by evidence based
-act in the national and international radiography and health care networks

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

Student is able to
-plan, implement and evaluate clinical radiography procedures and services in authentic clinical  environments (plain radiography, computed tomography, MRI, imaging quided interventios, nuclear medicine, radio therapy; expertice of radiography; Clinical placement of Erasmus Radiography Group Exhange Program)
 -reason/justify his/her action by evidence based
 -act in the national and international radiography and health care networks

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

Student is able to
-plan, implement and evaluate clinical radiography procedures and services in authentic clinical  environments (plain radiography, computed tomography, MRI, imaging quided interventios, nuclear medicine, radio therapy; expertice of radiography; Clinical placement of Erasmus Radiography Group Exhange Program)
 -reason/justify his/her action by evidence based
 -act in the national and international radiography and health care networks

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

Student is able to
-produce safe clinical interventions including imaging protocols and imaging quided interventios
-reason his/her action

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

Practice 2 is implemented as follows:
Part 1: Autumn semester 2 ECTS integrated into the Knowledge of patient care course.
Part 2 Spring semester 3 ECTS in true patient / client / resident contacts at various care and nursing facilities.
Prerequisite for the implementation of the Part 2 : there is evidence of skills at least level 1.

Objective

Sudent is able to plan, implement and evaluate plain radiography procedures in simulated learning environement.
 
 

Evaluation scale

Hyväksytty/Hylätty

Objective

Sudent is able to
- plan, implement and evaluate plain radiography procedures in clinical environement.
- reason his/her action

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

Student is able to
-plan, implement and evaluate clinical radiography procedures in authentic clinical  environments (plain radiography, computed tomography, nuclear medicine, radio therapy)
-reason/justify his/her action by evidence based

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

Student is able
- to plan, implement and evaluate clinical radiography procedures in clinical environments (plain radiography, computer tomography, MRI, imaging quided interventions, nuclear medicine and radiation therapy
--reason/justify his/her action by evidence based
- to act in national radiography networks

Content

Kliinisen radiografian toimintaympäristö- ja menetelmäkohtaisten sisältöjen (Messi) lisäksi:
 
 Yksilöosaaminen (oppimisen taidot, innovaatio-osaaminen):
-harjoitteluun valmistautuminen ja oman esittelyn ja  tavoitteiden laatiminen
-oman oppimisen ja osaamisen arvioiminen
-oman toiminnan perusteleminen
-kuvantamis- tai sädehoitotapahtumaan sisältyvien ongelmien ratkaiseminen
 
Kuvantamis- tai sädehoito-osaaminen:
- lähetteen tai hoitosuunnitelman mukaisen kuvantamis- tai hoitotapahtuman suunnitteleminen
- kuvantamis- tai hoitolaitteiden ja -välineiden turvallinen käyttäminen
- kuvantamis- tai hoitolaitteiden asemoiminen
- kuvausparametrien tai kuvausohjelman valitseminen
- potilaan anatomisten yksityiskohtien tunnistaminen
- potilaan asetteleminen kuvaus- tai hoitoasentoihin
- potilasinformaation tuottaminen ja käsitteleminen
- potilasinformaation riittävyyden arvioiminen
- kuvaus- tai sädehoitotapahtuman kirjaaminen ja tallentaminen
- anatomisten yksityiskohtien nimeäminen kuvista tai hoitosuunnitelmista
- toimintaympäristölle tunnusomaisten tietojärjestelmien käyttäminen
 
Potilaan hoitamis- ja ohjaamisosaaminen:
- potilaan toiminnallisten, biofyysisten, tiedollisten, sosiaalisten ja ekonomisten voimavarojen arvioiminen ja tukeminen
- potilaan oikeuksien ja yksityisyyden tukeminen
- potilaan kivun ja pelon hoitaminen
- potilaan vuorovaikutteinen ohjaaminen suomeksi että ruotsiksi
- potilaan esivalmistelu- ja jälkihoitotoimenpiteiden toteuttaminen ja perusteleminen
-  toimintaympäristölle tunnusomaisen turvallisen lääkehoidon toteuttaminen
- hätätilapotilaan hoitaminen
- potilaan hoidon jatkuvuuden takaaminen ja hoitotietojen kirjaaminen
- potilaan hoitoisuuden arvioiminen
 
Turvallisuusosaaminen:
- potilastietojen turvallinen käyttäminen
- potilaan säteilylatistuksen optimoiminen
- oman ja muiden säteilyaltistuksen optimoiminen
- aseptisesti työskenteleminen
- ergonomisesti työskenteleminen
-haittatapahtumien tunnistaminen ja raportoiminen
 
Laatuosaaminen:
- laitteistojen säännöllisiin laatumittauksiin osallistuminen
- kuvantamis- tai sädehoitotapahtuman sujuvuuden arvioiminen
- potilaan tai asiakkaan tyytyväisyyden arvioiminen
- toimintaympäristökohtaisen laatukäsikirjaan perehtyminen
- kliinisen radiografian palveluprosessin kuvaaminen
 
Yksilöosaaminen (oppimisen taidot, innovaatio-osaaminen):
-harjoitteluun valmistautuminen ja oman esittelyn ja  tavoitteiden laatiminen
-oman oppimisen ja osaamisen arvioiminen
-oman toiminnan perusteleminen
-kuvantamis- tai sädehoitotapahtumaan sisältyvien ongelmien ratkaiseminen
 
Yhteisöosaaminen (eettinen osaaminen, työyhteisö- ja työelämätaidot): -
- yhteistyössä toimiminen oman ammattiryhmän sisällä ja eri ammattiryhmien välillä
- toimintaympärist&

Evaluation scale

Hyväksytty/Hylätty

Objective

Student is able to
-plan, implement and evaluate clinical radiography procedures in authentic clinical  environments (plain radiography, computed tomography, MRI, imaging quided interventios, nuclear medicine, radio therapy)
-reason/justify his/her action by evidence based
-descibe the needs of clinical radiography to develop
 

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

Student is able to
-plan, implement and evaluate clinical radiography procedures in authentic clinical  environments (plain radiography, computed tomography, MRI, imaging quided interventios, nuclear medicine, radio therapy)
-reason/justify his/her action by evidence based
-descibe the needs of clinical radiography to develop

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

Student is able to
-plan, implement and evaluate clinical radiography procedures in authentic clinical  environments (plain radiography, computed tomography, MRI, imaging quided interventios, nuclear medicine, radio therapy)
-reason/justify his/her action by evidence based
-descibe the needs of clinical radiography to develop

Content

Kliinisen radiografian toimintaympäristö- ja menetelmäkohtaisten sisältöjen (Messi) lisäksi
 
Yksilöosaaminen (oppimisen taidot, innovaatio-osaaminen):
-harjoitteluun valmistautuminen ja oman esittelyn ja  tavoitteiden laatiminen
-oman oppimisen ja osaamisen arvioiminen
-oman toiminnan perusteleminen
-kuvantamis- tai sädehoitotapahtumaan sisältyvien ongelmien ratkaiseminen
-kliinisen radiografian kehittämiskohteiden osoittaminen ja kehittämisideoiden esitteleminen
 
Kuvantamis- tai sädehoito-osaaminen:
- lähetteen tai hoitosuunnitelman mukaisen kuvantamis- tai hoitotapahtuman suunnitteleminen
- kuvantamis- tai hoitolaitteiden ja -välineiden turvallinen käyttäminen
- kuvantamis- tai hoitolaitteiden asemoiminen
- kuvausparametrien tai kuvausohjelman valitseminen
- potilaan anatomisten yksityiskohtien tunnistaminen
- potilaan asetteleminen kuvaus- tai hoitoasentoihin
- potilasinformaation tuottaminen ja käsitteleminen
- potilasinformaation riittävyyden arvioiminen
- kuvaus- tai sädehoitotapahtuman kirjaaminen ja tallentaminen
- anatomisten yksityiskohtien nimeäminen kuvista tai hoitosuunnitelmista
- toimintaympäristölle tunnusomaisten tietojärjestelmien käyttäminen
 
Potilaan hoitamis- ja ohjaamisosaaminen:
- potilaan toiminnallisten, biofyysisten, tiedollisten, sosiaalisten ja ekonomisten voimavarojen arvioiminen ja tukeminen
- potilaan oikeuksien ja yksityisyyden tukeminen
- potilaan kivun ja pelon hoitaminen
- potilaan vuorovaikutteinen ohjaaminen suomeksi että ruotsiksi
-vieraskielisen potilaan vuorovaikutteinen ohjaaminen ja avustaminen
- potilasohjauksen ja –ohjeiden arvioiminen
- potilaan esivalmistelu- ja jälkihoitotoimenpiteiden toteuttaminen ja perusteleminen potilaalle
-  toimintaympäristölle tunnusomaisen turvallisen lääkehoidon toteuttaminen
- hätätilapotilaan hoitaminen
- potilaan hoidon jatkuvuuden takaaminen ja hoitotietojen kirjaaminen
- potilaan hoitoisuuden arvioiminen
 
Turvallisuusosaaminen:
- potilastietojen turvallinen käyttäminen
- potilaan säteilylatistuksen optimoiminen
- oman ja muiden säteilyaltistuksen optimoiminen
- aseptisesti työskenteleminen
- ergonomisesti työskenteleminen
-haittatapahtumien tunnistaminen ja raportoiminen
 
Laatuosaaminen:
- laitteistojen säännöllisiin laatumittauksiin osallistuminen
- kuvantamis- tai sädehoitotapahtuman sujuvuuden arvioiminen
- potilaan tai asiakkaan tyytyväisyyden arvioiminen
- toimintaympäristökohtaisen laatukäsikirjaan perehtyminen
- kliinisen radiografian palveluprosessin kuvaaminen ja arvioiminen
- kliinisen radiografian kuvaaminen osana liiketoimintaa
- kliinisen auditoinnin raporttiin tutustuminen
 
Yhteisöosaaminen (eettinen osaaminen, työyhteisö- ja työelämätaidot):
- yhteistyössä toimiminen oman ammattiryhmän sisällä ja eri ammattiryhmien välillä
- toimintaympär

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

Student is able to describe
- the most common degenerative disorders affecting musuloskeletal system
- themost common traumatic and non traumatic findings in plain film
- the common terminology being used

Content

Content is described in the implementation plan.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

On the course, the student gets to know Turku University of Applied Sciences as an organisation and work community.
- The student gets to know his/her study group and TUAS as a work community.
- The student can tell about Turku University of Applied Sciences as a learning environment.
- The student can tell what is studied and how you study in the field in question.
- The student can tell about issues affecting the ability to study and the related practices

Higher education study skills
- The student can evaluate his/her activities as a student in higher education and recognise his/her development needs
- The student understands the importance of study skills for the ability to study and as a working life skill
- The student recognizes the disadvantages of prolonged problematic situations for his/her studies
- The student recognizes the significance of the evaluation of and reflection on his/her own activities (self-reflection skills) in higher education studies and in developing as an expert
- The student can act in study groups and teams, and promotes reaching the group's target
- The student recognizes the significance of community-orientation and joint rules in studies and working life
- The student can give and receive constructive feedback which also promotes learning
- The student gives feedback through the student barometre questionnaire
Progress in studies and the targeted study time
- The student is committed to target-oriented studying
Support services for students
- The student is familiar with the guidance and counselling services in UAS studies
- The student is familiar with the contents and structure of the curriculum of his/her degree programme
- The student understands what HOPS is and why it is created
- The student knows how to use Peppi
- The student knows the opportunities for the accreditation of studies and competence

Content

- cooperation skills and working in a team
- Student Union TUO
- getting to know different learning environments and tools premises, Messi, Itslearning, Peppi, email, course timetables, library
- the special qualities of higher education studies compared to upper secondary/vocational studies: e.g. the importance of planning the use of time, large amount of independent work
- the special qualities of the field of study, the structure of the degree programme, ISP i.e. the individual study plan
- guidance and counselling services, student benefits, health care, insurances

Higher education study skills
- The material related to study and working life skills in Messi, the study skills guides of other higher education institutions and other study skills material online
- Planning of time use and using a calendar
- Broaching a subject and getting help from different guidance actors
- Expertise – of which skills do the actions of an expert consist
- Group dynamic and teamwork skills
- A safe study environment, the rules and regulations of TUAS
- The rules of the study group, acting in a work and study community, acting in the worker role
- Students' ways and methods of giving and receiving feedback
- Practising feedback skills
Progress in studies and the targeted study time
- months of student financial aid
- right to be absent

Support services for students
Guidance and counselling services: tutor teacher, study guidance counsellor, study secretary, international relations coordinator, degree programme leader, head of education and research
Routes which support well-being: study counselling psychologist, students’ health care services (public health nurse, doctor's and psychologist's services), accessibility, reading proficiency tests
- Curriculum: core studies, professional studies, practical training and thesis and elective studies; how and based on what to select them
- Development discussions as a study and working life skill
- Creating and updating the HOPS
- knowledge on the tasks and basic skill requirements in the field
- internationalization opportunities, in the home country and abroad
- instructions on the accreditation of studies and competence and electronic services

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

The student is able to specify the concepts and principles of radiation protection and applies those into clinical practice in health care in plain radiography and dental imaging as well in veterinary practice. He /she recognize, assess and minimize risks of radiation and prepares for the accidental exposures and is able to solve them. He /she is able to explain and supervise radiation protection practices including radiation protection of the staff and population. He /sh eis able to advice in the use of safe radiation including quality assurance and in implementing of new procedures and optimization. He / she develops radiation safety culture together with radiation safety expert.

Content

1. Basics of radiation physics in plain radiography, dental and veterinary imaging
2. Measurement technique and mathematical procedures in plain radiography, dental and veterinary imaging
- patient dose determination (ESAK; KAP, MGD, efective dose)
- Scattering of radiation in in plain radiography, dental and veterinary imaging
- effects of restricting and tube voltage to scattering
-planning of radiation protcetion shielding (HVL, materials)
3. Radiation protection in plain radiography, dental and veterinary imaging
- radiobiology
- legislation and international recommendations
-Tradition safety at workplace
- accidental exposures
- Radiation safety culture, further education of radiation protection and quality assurance
4. Requirements, acquisition and maintenance of equipment in plain radiography, dental and veterinary imaging

Evaluation scale

Hyväksytty/Hylätty

Qualifications

The student has passed all modules of imaging

Objective

The student
-is able to describe the research and development process
-is able to identify development needs in working life
-is able to describe and evaluate methods applicable for use in research and development
-is able to describe and evaluate methods for collecting, analysing and reporting data
-is able to evaluate reliability and ethical principles
-is able to act as an expert in multiprofessional groups

Content

Content
- purpose and targets in research and development
- quantitative and qualitative research and literature review
- development and research processes
- methods for collecting and analysing data
- methods for development
- reliability and ethics
- working in multiprofessional groups

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

The student
-is able to describe the research and development process
-is able to identify development needs in working life
-is able to describe and evaluate methods applicable for use in research and development
-is able to describe and evaluate methods for collecting, analysing and reporting data
-is able to evaluate reliability and ethical principles
-is able to act as an expert in multiprofessional groups

Content

Content
- purpose and targets in research and development
- quantitative and qualitative research and literature review
- development and research processes
- methods for collecting and analysing data
- methods for development
- reliability and ethics
- working in multiprofessional groups

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

The goal of the course is that the new student trains to exploratory working and learning methods. The student learns basics from the project working and project skills in social and/or health care focused projects and learns how different competences affect the presentation. Student learns how to work in a multidisciplinary team, if possible, and gets to know students from other disciplines. Student starts to build networks needed in work life. The aim of the course is also to increase communality of the faculty.

Part of international studies (if applicable)

Content

• introduction to project work
• integrating content with the development of multiprofessional expertise
• working in multidisciplinary project groups
• presenting a Project for other health care professionals (students)
• development of competence in guidence in health care

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

Emergency radiography

Objective

The goal of the course is that the new student trains to exploratory working and learning methods. The student learns basics from the project working and project skills in social and/or health care focused projects and learns how different competences affect the presentation. Student learns how to work in a multidisciplinary team, if possible, and gets to know students from other disciplines. Student starts to build networks needed in work life. The aim of the course is also to increase communality of the faculty.

Part of international studies (if applicable)

Content

• introduction to project work
• integrating content with the development of multiprofessional expertise
• working in multidisciplinary project groups
• presenting a Project for other health care professionals (students)
• development of competence in guidence in health care

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

Emergency radiography

Objective

The student is able to specify the concepts and principles of radiation protection and applies those into clinical practice in health care in plain radiography and dental imaging as well in veterinary practice. He /she recognize, assess and minimize risks of radiation and prepares for the accidental exposures and is able to solve them. He /she is able to explain and supervise radiation protection practices including radiation protection of the staff and population. He /sh eis able to advice in the use of safe radiation including quality assurance and in implementing of new procedures and optimization. He / she develops radiation safety culture together with radiation safety expert.

Content

1. Basics of radiation physics in plain radiography, dental and veterinary imaging
2. Measurement technique and mathematical procedures in plain radiography, dental and veterinary imaging
- patient dose determination (ESAK; KAP, MGD, efective dose)
- Scattering of radiation in in plain radiography, dental and veterinary imaging
- effects of restricting and tube voltage to scattering
-planning of radiation protcetion shielding (HVL, materials)
3. Radiation protection in plain radiography, dental and veterinary imaging
- radiobiology
- legislation and international recommendations
-Tradition safety at workplace
- accidental exposures
- Radiation safety culture, further education of radiation protection and quality assurance
4. Requirements, acquisition and maintenance of equipment in plain radiography, dental and veterinary imaging

Evaluation scale

Hyväksytty/Hylätty

Qualifications

The student has passed all modules of imaging

Objective

The student understands the importance of evidence-based activities and is able to utilize national and international sources of information. The student is able to interpret research using statistical methods.

The student is able to take sustainable development into account in his / her work and activities.

Content

- information retrieval
- source criticism
- source references
- presentation and number of statistics
- reading a scientific article

Ecological, economic, social and cultural aspects of sustainable development in clinical laboratory work and in our own activities.

Evaluation scale

Hyväksytty/Hylätty

Objective

Student is able to
- describe the role and responsibility of radiographer in human and safe imaging guided interventions- describe the indications of various interventions- describe the imaging equipment used as well as the principle of fluoroscopy and ultrasound devices- apply knowledge of anatomy and physiology- view risk factorsand apply their security expertise- isearch, evaluate and use information regarding imaging guided interventions

Content

xx

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

The student
-is able to describe the research and development process
-is able to identify development needs in working life
-is able to describe and evaluate methods applicable for use in research and development
-is able to describe and evaluate methods for collecting, analysing and reporting data
-is able to evaluate reliability and ethical principles
-is able to act as an expert in multiprofessional groups

Content

Content
- purpose and targets in research and development
- quantitative and qualitative research and literature review
- development and research processes
- methods for collecting and analysing data
- methods for development
- reliability and ethics
- working in multiprofessional groups

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

Students is able to
- describe principles of safe and humane magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) procedures
- reason radiographer's action by evidence based.

Content

Content is described in the implementation plan.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

Student is able to
-plan, implement and evaluate clinical radiography procedures in authentic clinical  environments (plain radiography, computed tomography, MRI, imaging quided interventios, nuclear medicine, radio therapy)
-reason/justify his/her action by evidence based
-descibe the needs of clinical radiography to develop

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

Student is able to
-plan, implement and evaluate clinical radiography procedures in authentic clinical  environments (plain radiography, computed tomography, MRI, imaging quided interventios, nuclear medicine, radio therapy)
-reason/justify his/her action by evidence based
-descibe the needs of clinical radiography to develop

Content

Kliinisen radiografian toimintaympäristö- ja menetelmäkohtaisten sisältöjen (Messi) lisäksi
 
Yksilöosaaminen (oppimisen taidot, innovaatio-osaaminen):
-harjoitteluun valmistautuminen ja oman esittelyn ja  tavoitteiden laatiminen
-oman oppimisen ja osaamisen arvioiminen
-oman toiminnan perusteleminen
-kuvantamis- tai sädehoitotapahtumaan sisältyvien ongelmien ratkaiseminen
-kliinisen radiografian kehittämiskohteiden osoittaminen ja kehittämisideoiden esitteleminen
 
Kuvantamis- tai sädehoito-osaaminen:
- lähetteen tai hoitosuunnitelman mukaisen kuvantamis- tai hoitotapahtuman suunnitteleminen
- kuvantamis- tai hoitolaitteiden ja -välineiden turvallinen käyttäminen
- kuvantamis- tai hoitolaitteiden asemoiminen
- kuvausparametrien tai kuvausohjelman valitseminen
- potilaan anatomisten yksityiskohtien tunnistaminen
- potilaan asetteleminen kuvaus- tai hoitoasentoihin
- potilasinformaation tuottaminen ja käsitteleminen
- potilasinformaation riittävyyden arvioiminen
- kuvaus- tai sädehoitotapahtuman kirjaaminen ja tallentaminen
- anatomisten yksityiskohtien nimeäminen kuvista tai hoitosuunnitelmista
- toimintaympäristölle tunnusomaisten tietojärjestelmien käyttäminen
 
Potilaan hoitamis- ja ohjaamisosaaminen:
- potilaan toiminnallisten, biofyysisten, tiedollisten, sosiaalisten ja ekonomisten voimavarojen arvioiminen ja tukeminen
- potilaan oikeuksien ja yksityisyyden tukeminen
- potilaan kivun ja pelon hoitaminen
- potilaan vuorovaikutteinen ohjaaminen suomeksi että ruotsiksi
-vieraskielisen potilaan vuorovaikutteinen ohjaaminen ja avustaminen
- potilasohjauksen ja –ohjeiden arvioiminen
- potilaan esivalmistelu- ja jälkihoitotoimenpiteiden toteuttaminen ja perusteleminen potilaalle
-  toimintaympäristölle tunnusomaisen turvallisen lääkehoidon toteuttaminen
- hätätilapotilaan hoitaminen
- potilaan hoidon jatkuvuuden takaaminen ja hoitotietojen kirjaaminen
- potilaan hoitoisuuden arvioiminen
 
Turvallisuusosaaminen:
- potilastietojen turvallinen käyttäminen
- potilaan säteilylatistuksen optimoiminen
- oman ja muiden säteilyaltistuksen optimoiminen
- aseptisesti työskenteleminen
- ergonomisesti työskenteleminen
-haittatapahtumien tunnistaminen ja raportoiminen
 
Laatuosaaminen:
- laitteistojen säännöllisiin laatumittauksiin osallistuminen
- kuvantamis- tai sädehoitotapahtuman sujuvuuden arvioiminen
- potilaan tai asiakkaan tyytyväisyyden arvioiminen
- toimintaympäristökohtaisen laatukäsikirjaan perehtyminen
- kliinisen radiografian palveluprosessin kuvaaminen ja arvioiminen
- kliinisen radiografian kuvaaminen osana liiketoimintaa
- kliinisen auditoinnin raporttiin tutustuminen
 
Yhteisöosaaminen (eettinen osaaminen, työyhteisö- ja työelämätaidot):
- yhteistyössä toimiminen oman ammattiryhmän sisällä ja eri ammattiryhmien välillä
- toimintaympär

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

Student is able to implement the thesis plan according to the principles of development work and research.

Content

raporttiluonnoksen esittäminen

Evaluation scale

Hyväksytty/Hylätty

Objective

Students can report on their Bachelor’s thesis flawlessly both orally and in writing.
Students are able to have oral Presentation and Rapport.
Students have to pass The Maturity Test.
Students have to write Publication concerning Thesis Subject.

Content

The Report of the Thesis
Oral Presentation
Matural test

Evaluation scale

Hyväksytty/Hylätty

Objective

Student is able to
-plan, implement and evaluate clinical radiography procedures and services in authentic clinical environments (plain radiography, computed tomography, MRI, imaging quided interventios, nuclear medicine, radio therapy; expertice of radiography; Clinical placement of Erasmus Radiography Group Exhange Program)
-reason/justify his/her action by evidence based
-act in the national and international radiography and health care networks

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

Student is able to
-plan, implement and evaluate clinical radiography procedures and services in authentic clinical  environments (plain radiography, computed tomography, MRI, imaging quided interventios, nuclear medicine, radio therapy; expertice of radiography; Clinical placement of Erasmus Radiography Group Exhange Program)
 -reason/justify his/her action by evidence based
 -act in the national and international radiography and health care networks

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

Student is able to
-plan, implement and evaluate clinical radiography procedures and services in authentic clinical  environments (plain radiography, computed tomography, MRI, imaging quided interventios, nuclear medicine, radio therapy; expertice of radiography; Clinical placement of Erasmus Radiography Group Exhange Program)
 -reason/justify his/her action by evidence based
 -act in the national and international radiography and health care networks

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

The student is able
- to describe current challenges of population’s health and well-being as well as factors affecting them
- to describe the indicators of health and well-being as well as the meaning of knowledge when identifying and organizing services
- to describe social and health services organization and legislation
- to describe social security system,
- to search for information of social and health services to clients in different life situations
- to recognize the meaning of multiprofessionality in the perspective of service needs
- to act more securely and understand the responsibility for promoting security

Content

1. The status of the population’s health and well-being
- current challenges and factors affecting them
- promotion of health and functional ability, prevention of illnesses and accidents
- registers and statistics

2. Social and health services
- social and health care organization and development of it, funding, responsibilities, control/monitoring and client’s and patient’s rights
- social and health services
- income security
- searching information about social and health services and benefits

3. Security in social and health care

Evaluation scale

Hyväksytty/Hylätty

Objective

Student is able
- to plan, implement and evaluate clinical radiography procedures in clinical environments (plain radiography, computer tomography, MRI, imaging quided interventions, nuclear medicine and radiation therapy
--reason/justify his/her action by evidence based
- to act in national radiography networks

Content

Kliinisen radiografian toimintaympäristö- ja menetelmäkohtaisten sisältöjen (Messi) lisäksi:
 
 Yksilöosaaminen (oppimisen taidot, innovaatio-osaaminen):
-harjoitteluun valmistautuminen ja oman esittelyn ja  tavoitteiden laatiminen
-oman oppimisen ja osaamisen arvioiminen
-oman toiminnan perusteleminen
-kuvantamis- tai sädehoitotapahtumaan sisältyvien ongelmien ratkaiseminen
 
Kuvantamis- tai sädehoito-osaaminen:
- lähetteen tai hoitosuunnitelman mukaisen kuvantamis- tai hoitotapahtuman suunnitteleminen
- kuvantamis- tai hoitolaitteiden ja -välineiden turvallinen käyttäminen
- kuvantamis- tai hoitolaitteiden asemoiminen
- kuvausparametrien tai kuvausohjelman valitseminen
- potilaan anatomisten yksityiskohtien tunnistaminen
- potilaan asetteleminen kuvaus- tai hoitoasentoihin
- potilasinformaation tuottaminen ja käsitteleminen
- potilasinformaation riittävyyden arvioiminen
- kuvaus- tai sädehoitotapahtuman kirjaaminen ja tallentaminen
- anatomisten yksityiskohtien nimeäminen kuvista tai hoitosuunnitelmista
- toimintaympäristölle tunnusomaisten tietojärjestelmien käyttäminen
 
Potilaan hoitamis- ja ohjaamisosaaminen:
- potilaan toiminnallisten, biofyysisten, tiedollisten, sosiaalisten ja ekonomisten voimavarojen arvioiminen ja tukeminen
- potilaan oikeuksien ja yksityisyyden tukeminen
- potilaan kivun ja pelon hoitaminen
- potilaan vuorovaikutteinen ohjaaminen suomeksi että ruotsiksi
- potilaan esivalmistelu- ja jälkihoitotoimenpiteiden toteuttaminen ja perusteleminen
-  toimintaympäristölle tunnusomaisen turvallisen lääkehoidon toteuttaminen
- hätätilapotilaan hoitaminen
- potilaan hoidon jatkuvuuden takaaminen ja hoitotietojen kirjaaminen
- potilaan hoitoisuuden arvioiminen
 
Turvallisuusosaaminen:
- potilastietojen turvallinen käyttäminen
- potilaan säteilylatistuksen optimoiminen
- oman ja muiden säteilyaltistuksen optimoiminen
- aseptisesti työskenteleminen
- ergonomisesti työskenteleminen
-haittatapahtumien tunnistaminen ja raportoiminen
 
Laatuosaaminen:
- laitteistojen säännöllisiin laatumittauksiin osallistuminen
- kuvantamis- tai sädehoitotapahtuman sujuvuuden arvioiminen
- potilaan tai asiakkaan tyytyväisyyden arvioiminen
- toimintaympäristökohtaisen laatukäsikirjaan perehtyminen
- kliinisen radiografian palveluprosessin kuvaaminen
 
Yksilöosaaminen (oppimisen taidot, innovaatio-osaaminen):
-harjoitteluun valmistautuminen ja oman esittelyn ja  tavoitteiden laatiminen
-oman oppimisen ja osaamisen arvioiminen
-oman toiminnan perusteleminen
-kuvantamis- tai sädehoitotapahtumaan sisältyvien ongelmien ratkaiseminen
 
Yhteisöosaaminen (eettinen osaaminen, työyhteisö- ja työelämätaidot): -
- yhteistyössä toimiminen oman ammattiryhmän sisällä ja eri ammattiryhmien välillä
- toimintaympärist&

Evaluation scale

Hyväksytty/Hylätty

Objective

Students
- can identify life-threatening situations and first aid needs
- are able to give the needed first aid
- are aware of the health care plans drawn up for exceptional situations.

Content

Students
- are familiar with normal microbes and their significance, and clinically important pathogens
- are aware of the different levels of aseptics and their requirements for the promotion of patient safety
- know how to work according to aseptic principles in the health care field.

Evaluation scale

Hyväksytty/Hylätty

Objective

Student is able to
*descibe all types of medication used in clinical radiography and in emergency resuscitation
*describe risks of medication
*reason radiographer's action by evidence based

Content

Content is described in the implementation plan.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

Students  is able to
- describe principles of safe and humane plain x-ray imaging, mammography and  dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) procedures
- describe significance and criteria of screening
- to reason radiographer's action by evidence based.

Content

Content is described in the implementation plan.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

Sudent is able to plan, implement and evaluate plain radiography procedures in simulated learning environement.
 
 

Evaluation scale

Hyväksytty/Hylätty

Objective

Sudent is able to
- plan, implement and evaluate plain radiography procedures in clinical environement.
- reason his/her action

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

xx

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

The student is able to act in a purposeful way in communicating and interacting in working life situations. He/she is able to take into consideration the receiver, the situation and the demands of the field and to communicate in an analytical, understandable and convincing manner.
The student is able and willing to develop his/her skills in the Finnish language and communication as part of his/her professional competence.

Content

Students know how to
-interpret the professional texts in their own field as part of information literacy skills and use their skills in new, different situations (for instance, text analysis and summary)
-write factual, consistent and understandable texts (for instance, small scale studies, reports, essays, professional presentations using source material) and to give references to sources according to given instructions (the basics of research communication)
-use up-to-date tools as support for their own linguistic ability in proof-reading (central contents in correcting language and text)
-act in a professional way in the verbal communication situations in working life, and to prepare for diverse speaking situations in a purposeful way (i.e. with the help of situation analysis and analysis plan)
-express themselves clearly using visual aids and by using language appropriate to the situation
-assess their own communication skills (the language and structure of spoken and written language, factors affecting readability and understandability, the effectiveness of the message)and to give and receive constructive criticism

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

The aim of the course is to activate and develop the students’ field-relevant English language and communication skills. The students will gain professional skills in various spoken and written communicative situations encountered in working life and society. In addition, they will learn to utilize tools and techniques to further develop their skills in authentic, field-specific contexts. More specifically, students will focus on developing their language and communication skills in.
Upon completing the course, the students should have acquired skills to communicate at level B2 according to European Framework of Reference for Languages, which states that at B2-level students should be able to produce clear, coherent and well-structured texts, present detailed descriptions related to one’s field of interest, express and exchange opinions using fluent language, follow complex arguments, and read longer articles and reports.

Content

- writing professional, field-specific texts
- presenting and discussing field-specific topics in a professional manner
- reading field-specific texts and utilizing the information in professional contexts
- learning and using key terminology of their field
- becoming professional, autonomous language users in working life

Materials

- Materials shared by the teacher.
- Materials searched from the web by the students.
- Materials produced by the students themselves.
- All materials will be available in the Itslearning learning environment. - No costs for the student.

Teaching methods

Face-to-face teaching (online teaching when needed), tasks done in class, independent work, pair/group work

International connections

- Work-life-oriented learning objectives and material
- Digital learning
- Independent work
- Group work and team learning
- Flipped learning
- Self-reflection
- Peer review

Student workload

3cr = 81h

Content scheduling

The aim of this course is to activate and develop the students’ field-relevant English language and communication skills. The students gain professional skills in various spoken and written communicative situations encountered in working life and society. In addition, they learn to utilize tools and techniques to further develop their skills in authentic, field-specific contexts.


Upon completing the course, the students have acquired sufficient skills to communicate at level B2 of the European Framework of Reference for Languages, which states that at level B2, students should be able to produce clear, coherent, and well-structured texts, present detailed descriptions related to their field of interest, express and exchange opinions using fluent language, follow complex argumentation, and read longer articles and reports.

- Writing professional, field-specific texts
- Presenting and discussing field-specific topics in a professional manner
- Reading field-specific texts and utilizing the information in professional contexts
- Learning and using key terminology of the field
- Becoming professional, autonomous language users in working life

Course topics:
• Personal learning goals and needs, language level, and professional profile
• Field-related topics such as the Finnish Health care system
• Reading and summarizing field-related material
• Professional vocabulary
• Self-reflection

- Group A 27.08.2024 10.30 – 14.30 ICT_C2025
Group B 29.8.2024 08.00-11.30 ICT_C2025
Lesson 1 – Course introduction + self-assessment

- 04.09.2024 09.30 - 13.30 EDU_2006_2007
Lesson 2 – Vocabulary building + Reading strategies

- 17.09.2024 09.00 - 13.00 ICT_C2025
Lesson 3 – Oral skills + professional language

- 25.09.2024 12.30 - 16.00 EDU_2027
Lesson 4 – Presentations

- 09.10.2024 13.00–15.00 EDU_2004 Exam

Further information

- Itslearning

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment methods and criteria

The course is graded on a scale of 0-5:

Course performances are scored, which will form the overall course grade. Both oral and written performances affect the grade. Some evaluated tasks are performed on campus, and some as independent work alone or in a group; see Itslearning for more detailed criteria.

Evaluation and feedback: Teacher’s feedback, task-specific points, self-reflection, peer feedback.

The course grade comprises as follows:
Compulsory attendance 75% No substitute tasks.
Exam: 30% - grading 0 to 5
Presentation: 30% - grading 0 to 5
Recording: 20% - PASS/FAIL
The remaining 20% are active in class participation and completing the assignments.

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

The student does not pass the course or has not completed the course tasks according to the instructions (e.g., use of artificial intelligence against the instructions). Course tasks are unreturned, or the course performance is incomplete.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Handling different topics in English in various professional situations is relatively narrow and one-sided. The produced text responds to the task inadequately and does not have a logical flow to it. The text contains some difficult-to-understand points. The language is satisfactory. Language use contains some structures and basic vocabulary; however, there are errors in their use. The student can speak moderately about the central topics of their field. The speech is not always easy to follow. There may be significant deficiencies in coherence and interaction. The language is quite simple and hesitant. However, the student can convey the message, even though errors in structure and pronunciation sometimes hinder understanding. There may be deficiencies in language positivity and course activity. The course tasks have been completed satisfactorily.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

Handling the topic in English is versatile and, for the most part, corresponds to the given task in various professional situations. The language is structurally clear and logical. Oral and written output is fluent and clear. Structures and professional vocabulary are well-mastered. Some errors may occur. The student understands the English-language material of their field. Speech is logical and consistent. Interaction and reaction are mostly fluent and clear. The handling of the topic corresponds to the task and is suitable for different professional situations. The text proceeds moderately logically. Style errors may occur. Errors may occur in the most demanding structures and expressions. The student can speak well about various topics in their own field. The speech is easy to follow. The language is fluent, although some breaks and pronunciation errors may occur. In general, a language-positive attitude and active participation. There are no deficiencies in the course performance, and the tasks are done well.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

Handling the topic in English is versatile and skilled, fully responding to the task in various professional situations. The text is structurally very clear and logical. Transitions are cohesively smooth. The student can convey the message naturally with an appropriate style. The language is very fluent and versatile. Structures are varied, and the professional vocabulary is extensive. Occasional errors may occur in the most demanding structures and expressions. The student can speak excellently about various topics in their own field. Speech is purposeful, very consistent, on-point, and logical. Transitions from one topic to another are very smooth. Interaction is very skilled, and non-verbal communication effectively supports speech. Language (speech, pronunciation, and intonation) is fluent, clear, precise, and normally paced. The course performance shows activity and language positivity, and the tasks have been performed excellently.

Objective

Student is able to describe
- the most common degenerative disorders affecting musuloskeletal system
- themost common traumatic and non traumatic findings in plain film
- the common terminology being used

Content

Content is described in the implementation plan.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

Students are familiar with the basics of human anatomy and physiology.
 

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

Student is able to
-plan, implement and evaluate clinical radiography procedures in authentic clinical  environments (plain radiography, computed tomography, MRI, imaging quided interventios, nuclear medicine, radio therapy)
-reason/justify his/her action by evidence based
-descibe the needs of clinical radiography to develop
 

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

The student
-is able to describe the research and development process
-is able to identify development needs in working life
-is able to describe and evaluate methods applicable for use in research and development
-is able to describe and evaluate methods for collecting, analysing and reporting data
-is able to evaluate reliability and ethical principles
-is able to act as an expert in multiprofessional groups

Content

Content
- purpose and targets in research and development
- quantitative and qualitative research and literature review
- development and research processes
- methods for collecting and analysing data
- methods for development
- reliability and ethics
- working in multiprofessional groups

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

Students can draft a viable plan for their Bachelor’s thesis.

Content

- Opinnäytetyön suunnitelman laatiminen

- Opinnäytetyön suunnitelman esittäminen

- Opinnäytetyön vertaisarviointi (opponointi)

Evaluation scale

Hyväksytty/Hylätty

Objective

Students is able to
-describe principles of safe and humane computed tomography (CT) procedures including contrast agents
-reason radiographer's action by evidence based.

Content

Content is described in the implementation plan.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

Students  is able to describe
- principles of planning the different stages of radiotherapy in the patient’s chain of care and
- different kinds of implementation of radiotherapy
- the side effects of radiotherapy and methods to advise patients for the prevention and treatment of side effects
- the methods to support patient coping strategies
- safe procedures in the radiotherapy department
- cancer as a disease and different kind methods to cure cancer.
Student is able to reason radiographer's action by evidence based.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

Student is able to describe
- the principles of nuclear medicine
- radiopharmaceuticals and their use
- patient guidance in different phases of nuclear medicine examinations
- radiation protection and safety in nuclear medicine
Student is able to reason radiographer's action by evidence based.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

Student is able to
-plan, implement and evaluate clinical radiography procedures in authentic clinical  environments (plain radiography, computed tomography, nuclear medicine, radio therapy)
-reason/justify his/her action by evidence based

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

 Student can describe
- envirornments of clinical radiography
-  legal and ethical basis for profession
- principles of radiation biology and radiation physics
- evidence based clinical radiography

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

Students are familiar with the basics of human anatomy and physiology.
 

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

The student is able to describe
- special features of the patient centered care in clinical radiography
- methods to support patient's coping strategies
- the equipment to be used in imaging procedures and interventions
- principles of ergonomics
- cooperation with ward and ward as partner
 Student is able to reason radiographer's action by evidence based.
 

Content

Content is described in the implementation plan

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

Students  is able to
- describe principles of safe and humane plain x-ray imaging, mammography and  dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) procedures
- describe significance and criteria of screening
- to reason radiographer's action by evidence based.

Content

Content is described in the implementation plan.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

On the course, the student gets to know Turku University of Applied Sciences as an organisation and work community.
- The student gets to know his/her study group and TUAS as a work community.
- The student can tell about Turku University of Applied Sciences as a learning environment.
- The student can tell what is studied and how you study in the field in question.
- The student can tell about issues affecting the ability to study and the related practices

Higher education study skills
- The student can evaluate his/her activities as a student in higher education and recognise his/her development needs
- The student understands the importance of study skills for the ability to study and as a working life skill
- The student recognizes the disadvantages of prolonged problematic situations for his/her studies
- The student recognizes the significance of the evaluation of and reflection on his/her own activities (self-reflection skills) in higher education studies and in developing as an expert
- The student can act in study groups and teams, and promotes reaching the group's target
- The student recognizes the significance of community-orientation and joint rules in studies and working life
- The student can give and receive constructive feedback which also promotes learning
- The student gives feedback through the student barometre questionnaire
Progress in studies and the targeted study time
- The student is committed to target-oriented studying
Support services for students
- The student is familiar with the guidance and counselling services in UAS studies
- The student is familiar with the contents and structure of the curriculum of his/her degree programme
- The student understands what HOPS is and why it is created
- The student knows how to use Peppi
- The student knows the opportunities for the accreditation of studies and competence

Content

- cooperation skills and working in a team
- Student Union TUO
- getting to know different learning environments and tools premises, Messi, Itslearning, Peppi, email, course timetables, library
- the special qualities of higher education studies compared to upper secondary/vocational studies: e.g. the importance of planning the use of time, large amount of independent work
- the special qualities of the field of study, the structure of the degree programme, ISP i.e. the individual study plan
- guidance and counselling services, student benefits, health care, insurances

Higher education study skills
- The material related to study and working life skills in Messi, the study skills guides of other higher education institutions and other study skills material online
- Planning of time use and using a calendar
- Broaching a subject and getting help from different guidance actors
- Expertise – of which skills do the actions of an expert consist
- Group dynamic and teamwork skills
- A safe study environment, the rules and regulations of TUAS
- The rules of the study group, acting in a work and study community, acting in the worker role
- Students' ways and methods of giving and receiving feedback
- Practising feedback skills
Progress in studies and the targeted study time
- months of student financial aid
- right to be absent

Support services for students
Guidance and counselling services: tutor teacher, study guidance counsellor, study secretary, international relations coordinator, degree programme leader, head of education and research
Routes which support well-being: study counselling psychologist, students’ health care services (public health nurse, doctor's and psychologist's services), accessibility, reading proficiency tests
- Curriculum: core studies, professional studies, practical training and thesis and elective studies; how and based on what to select them
- Development discussions as a study and working life skill
- Creating and updating the HOPS
- knowledge on the tasks and basic skill requirements in the field
- internationalization opportunities, in the home country and abroad
- instructions on the accreditation of studies and competence and electronic services

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

The student is able to describe the content and characteristics of his/her future profession and the competence it will require.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Objective

Student is able to
-produce safe clinical interventions including imaging protocols and imaging quided interventios
-reason his/her action

Evaluation scale

H-5

Qualifications

Practice 2 is implemented as follows:
Part 1: Autumn semester 2 ECTS integrated into the Knowledge of patient care course.
Part 2 Spring semester 3 ECTS in true patient / client / resident contacts at various care and nursing facilities.
Prerequisite for the implementation of the Part 2 : there is evidence of skills at least level 1.