Master of Business Administration, Quality Management
Master of Business Administration, Quality Management
Enrollment
06.11.2023 - 14.12.2023
Timing
10.01.2024 - 20.03.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
5 op
RDI portion
1 op
Mode of delivery
Distance learning
Unit
Engineering and Business
Teaching languages
- English
Seats
0 - 20
Degree programmes
- Master of Business Administration, Quality Management
Teachers
- Maarit Laiho
- Mervi Varhelahti
Objective
After completing the course, the student is able to
-Demonstrate the ability to apply self-leadership strategies
-Practice techniques to enhance self-awareness and emotional intelligence.
-Recognize the connection between self-leadership and resilience.
Analyze the role of resilience in the workplace.
-Develop strategies to enhance personal resilience in professional settings.
Content
Introduction to Self-Leadership and resilience
Self-leadership strategies
Self-Awareness and Emotional Intelligence
Resilience in the Workplace
Materials
Literature in ITS and self-selected materials
Teaching methods
100% online, individual and collaborative learning methods
private reflection diary (visible only to teachers) & group work
Exam schedules
No exam
International connections
Sharing and creating knowledge individually and collectively (SECI model)
Learning can be directed according to your own everyday work life and situation
Student workload
Preliminary assignment
Group work and assignments
Private reflection diary
Content scheduling
The course starts with an independent preliminary assignment, which students will receive 3.1.2024
Online meeting days in Zoom
10.1.2024 at 8:00-12:00
24.1.2024 at 8:00-12:00
28.2.2024 at 8:00-12:00
the course ends on 6.3.2024 (= last day to return the learning assignment).
Evaluation scale
H-5
Assessment methods and criteria
Preliminary assignment (10 % of the total grade)
Group work and assignments (40 % of the total grade)
Private reflection diary (50 % of the total grade)
Assessment criteria, fail (0)
Quantity: the work is not completed and or;
Quality: the minimum content requirements are not met.
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Participation, thinking and communication are acceptable.
Appear to grasp theory and have made a start in showing its applicability.
Assessment criteria, good (3-4)
Participation, thinking, and communication are good.
General understanding of theory and application in real-life context.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Master of theory and penetrating insights in real-life context.
Motivated participation, outstanding thinking and communication.