Siirry suoraan sisältöön

Building, Maintaining and Evaluating the Quality Management System (5 op)

Toteutuksen tunnus: MS00CR97-3001

Toteutuksen perustiedot


Ilmoittautumisaika

02.12.2024 - 31.12.2024

Ajoitus

01.01.2025 - 31.07.2025

Opintopistemäärä

5 op

Virtuaaliosuus

5 op

Toteutustapa

Etäopetus

Yksikkö

Tekniikka ja liiketoiminta / Master School

Toimipiste

Paikasta riippumaton

Opetuskielet

  • Englanti

Paikat

10 - 35

Koulutus

  • Master of Business Administration, Quality Management

Opettaja

  • Heidi Salokangas
  • Sari Airenne

Ryhmät

  • YQMES24V
    Master of Engineering, Quality Management
  • YTERIS24
    Insinööri (ylempi AMK), Terveysteknologia
  • YQMBS24V
    Master of Business Administration, Quality Management
  • YTERTS24
    Tradenomi (ylempi AMK), terveysteknologia
  • 13.03.2025 08:00 - 12:00, Building, Maintaining and Evaluating the Quality Management System MS00CR97-3001
  • 20.03.2025 08:00 - 12:00, Building, Maintaining and Evaluating the Quality Management System MS00CR97-3001
  • 03.04.2025 08:00 - 12:00, Building, Maintaining and Evaluating the Quality Management System MS00CR97-3001
  • 24.04.2025 08:00 - 12:00, Building, Maintaining and Evaluating the Quality Management System MS00CR97-3001

Tavoitteet

After completing the course, the student will be able to
- launch a quality management system project
- understand the link between a company's quality system and its strategy
- apply the various quality management system requirements in a way that is appropriate to their own environment
- be able to produce documented information to support their own work (e.g. management review agenda, internal audit plan, writing guidelines)
- knows what quality system certification means and how to obtain it
- knows what change control means in context of quality management system

Sisältö

- stages of a quality system project
- How to conduct a GAP analysis
- quality policy, quality objectives, performance indicators

Oppimateriaalit

SFS-online 9000-series and industry-specific standards. Other material provided by the lecturers in ItsLearning.

Opetusmenetelmät

lectures
independent study work
case studies
group work
other lecture assignments

Tenttien ajankohdat ja uusintamahdollisuudet

N/A

Pedagogiset toimintatavat ja kestävä kehitys

problem solving
case studies
innovation pedagogy

Toteutuksen valinnaiset suoritustavat

None.

Opiskelijan ajankäyttö ja kuormitus

The student's workload is 133 hours in total, of which 10 hours are lectures and 123 hours are independent work, both individually and in groups.

Orientation assignments before the lectures 43 h
Group assignment: quality system project plan 40 h
Individual assignment: learning diary 40 h

The workload is indicative and indicative of the average workload required to achieve the learning objectives of the course and the grade 3/5. Depending on the student's previous knowledge and experience, the workload may be less or more. The competence acquired in the course will be assessed through assignments and other deliverables, not through the number of hours worked.

Sisällön jaksotus

After completing the course, the student will be able to
- launch a quality management system project
- understand the link between a company's quality system and its strategy
- apply the various quality management system requirements in a way that is appropriate to their own environment
- be able to produce documented information to support their own work (e.g. management review agenda, internal audit plan, writing guidelines)
- knows what quality system certification means and how to obtain it
- knows what change control means in context of quality management system

Course content:
- stages of a quality system project
- How to conduct a GAP analysis
- quality policy, quality objectives, performance indicators

Thu 13.3 online 8.00-12.00
Thu 20.3 online 8.00-12.00
Thu 3.4 online 8.00-12.00
Thu 24.4 online 8.00-12.00

Viestintäkanava ja lisätietoja

ItsLearning

Arviointiasteikko

H-5

Arviointimenetelmät ja arvioinnin perusteet

Preliminary assignments: accepted/completed.
Group assignment: on a scale of passed/failed.
Individual assignment: on a scale of 0-5,
Learning Diary: on a scale 0-5.
The grade will be the average of the individual and group assignments. The assessment will be based on the results of the individual and group assignments and the competencies reflected in the reporting.
Returning assignments after the specified return date (late) may result in a lower grade.

Hylätty (0)

Student have not returned all the assignments and have not attended the face-to-face course or completed the substitute assignments successfully. The returned assignments are too vague and/or do not cover the main part of what is requested in the assignment.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1-2)

Successful completion of all assignments (the student will request a substitute for the absence).
Based on the assignment answers, the student will identify the key concepts and methods of quality management systems and change management and will be able to apply them to a limited extent in the description. No knowledge of academic practices.

Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3-4)

Successful completion of all assignments (the student will apply for a substitute assignment in case of absence).
Based on the assignment answers, the student will have a good command of the concepts and methods of quality management systems and change management and will be able to apply them correctly in the description and development of quality management systems. Knowledge of academic practices is good, although there may be systematic minor errors.

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

Successful completion of all assignments (the student will apply for a substitute assignment in case of absence).
Based on the assignment answers, the student will have a thorough understanding of quality management systems as part of the company's strategy and as a guarantee of customer satisfaction, as well as a command of the methods for measuring and developing QMS processes and quality. A grade of 5 requires good performance in both individual and group tasks. The excellent knowledge of academic practices.