Practical Training in RDI Projects and Services (5 cr)

Evaluation scale

H-5

Content scheduling

Wednesdays are devoted for this course. If there is no joint meeting for all groups, you work with your own group (team).

1.9. 9.00-11.30 Introduction, 12.30-15.45 The training starts. https://turkuamk.zoom.us/j/66871977830
8.9 9.00-10.00 Training for project managers (project coordinators)
15.9 Project groups work
22.9 Project groups work
29.9 /Return your project plan
6.10 at 9.00-10.00 Project managers (project coordinator) meet teachers
13.10 Project groups work
20.10. 9.00-11.30 Interrim meeting
https://turkuamk.zoom.us/j/64331024457?from=addon
27.10 Project groups work
3.11 Project groups work
10.11 at 9.00-10.00 Project managers (project coordinators) meet teachers
17.11 Project groups work
24.11 at 9.00-10.00 Project managers (project coordinators) meet teachers
1.12 Project groups work
8.12 Project groups work
15.12. 9.00-11.30 Final seminar for all
https://turkuamk.zoom.us/j/65836293842?from=addon

Objective

Objectives
Student is introduced to applying his/her knowledge in project work, leadership, research and development, financial administration and planning, as well as external entrepreneurship, in a practical working-life project.

Content

Content
Project planning, start-up, implementation and evaluation

Materials

Student guide is on the Itslearning workspace.
Students also need to read material concerning the field of assignment.

Teaching methods

-project learning
-learning by doing
-learning in a team
-teachers coaching

Pedagogic approaches and sustainable development

Innovation padagogy
1. Students get an assignment from working life, related to development of services
2. Leaning takes places in smaller groups (teams), coached by a project manager (project coordinator) and a teacher

Completion alternatives

-

Student workload

Altogether 135 hours. Students report their training hours individually.

Evaluation methods and criteria

- results of the project
- project reporting
* evaluation from the working life partner
* self evaluation of the group and its´members
* teacher´s evaluation

Return of all reporting 17.12.21 (eventually 28.2.2022).

Failed (0)

-assignment not completed
- reporting missing

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

- assignment completed but the contractor is not satisfied with the results.
- the project group fail to work effectively as a team
- the team is not committed to the work
- the group does not use teachers´ / contractor´s guidance
- the report is inadequate.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

- assignment completed and the contractor is satisfied with the results.
- the project group works effectively as a team
- the team is committed to the work
- the group uses teachers´ / contractor´s guidance
- the report is informative.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- assignment completed and the contractor is very satisfied with the results.
- innovative performance throughout the process
- the project group works effectively as a team
- the team is committed to the work
- the group uses teachers´ / contractor´s guidance
- the report is excellent.

Further information

Changes may take place.