Study Guide

Materials

theses made by others, previously completed theses

Teaching methods

lectures, seminars, face-to-face and distance learning, independent work

Student workload

-participation in organized lectures and supervised teaching,
-conclusion of the thesis plan and thesis agreement,
- familiarization and reporting with theses written by others (Theseus)
-working as an opponent
-presenting your own thesis

Content scheduling

The student draws up a plan for his thesis. The student formulates a key investigative question and justifies own arguments both verbally and in writing. The student presents their research idea or an idea of a functional or artistic or pedagogic project in seminars and acts as an opponent of the research idea/ plan and text of fellow students. Students complete an online course in information retrieval. The student works on the thesis and presents its progress and the final thesis in seminars.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment methods and criteria

-participation in organized lectures and supervised courses and in processing of other theses and theses,
-conclusion of the thesis plan and the thesis agreement,
- study and report on others' theses
-working as an opponent
-presenting your thesis at different stages of it

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

The student does not manage the core competencies of the study course in a manner that meets minimum requirements.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

The student demonstrates mastery of the study course's core competencies in a manner that meets the minimum requirements. The student has participated in the required group assignments and evaluation discussions and completed the learning tasks required in the study course successfully.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

The student demonstrates that he/she masters the core competencies of the study course well. The student has participated in the required group assignments and evaluation discussions well and completed the learning tasks required in the study course successfully. The student is able to direct his/her own work in a self-directed, goal-oriented and responsible manner.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student demonstrates his/her mastery of the core competencies of the study course commendably/excellently. The student has participated in the required group assignments and evaluation discussions excellently and completed the learning tasks required in the study course successfully. The student is able to direct his/her own work in a self-directed, goal-oriented and responsible manner. The student demonstrates profound competence of the study course objectives.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Materials

theses made by others, previously completed theses

Teaching methods

lectures, seminars, face-to-face and distance learning, independent work

Student workload

- participation in organized lectures and supervised teaching,
-conclusion of the thesis plan and thesis agreement,
- in music training, familiarization and reporting with the finished theses written earlier by others is required (3 written theses and 2 artistic/functional theses)
- working as an opponent
- presenting your own thesis

Content scheduling

MUSIC
The student draws up a plan for his thesis. The student formulates a key investigative question for himself and justifies his arguments both verbally and in writing. The student presents his/ her research idea or an idea of a functional or artistic or pedagogic project in seminars and acts as an opponent of the research idea/ plan and text of his fellow students. Students complete an online course in information retrieval. The student works on the thesis and presents its progress and the final thesis in seminars.

Further information

intra.turkuamk.fi/ itslearning/ Opinnäytetyö EMKO 2023-2024

zoom-link for joining the music thesis seminars
https://turkuamk.zoom.us/j/65297017528#success

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment methods and criteria

-participation in organized lectures and supervised courses and in processing of other theses and theses,
-conclusion of the thesis plan and the thesis agreement,
- study and report on others' theses in music (3 written and 2 artistic/functional theses)
-working as an opponent
-presenting your thesis at different stages of it

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

The student does not manage the core competencies of the study course in a manner that meets minimum requirements.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

The student demonstrates his/her mastery of the study course's core competencies in a manner that meets the minimum requirements. The student has participated in the required group assignments and evaluation discussions and completed the learning tasks required in the study course successfully.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

The student demonstrates that he/she masters the core competencies of the study course well. The student has participated in the required group assignments and evaluation discussions and completed the learning tasks required in the study course successfully. The student is able to direct his/her own work in a self-directed, goal-oriented and responsible manner.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student demonstrates his/her mastery of the core competencies of the study course commendably/excellently. The student has participated in the required group assignments and evaluation discussions and completed the learning tasks required in the study course successfully. The student is able to direct his/her own work in a self-directed, goal-oriented and responsible manner. The student demonstrates profound competence of the study course objectives.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Evaluation scale

H-5

Materials

theses made by others, previously completed theses

Teaching methods

lectures, seminars, face-to-face and distance learning, independent work

Student workload

-participation in organized lectures and supervised teaching,
-conclusion of the thesis plan and thesis agreement,
- in music training, also familiarization and reporting with theses written by others is required (3 written theses and 2 artistic/functional theses)
-working as an opponent
-presenting your own thesis

Content scheduling

MUSIC
The student draws up a plan for his thesis. The student formulates a key investigative question for himself and justifies his arguments both verbally and in writing. The student presents his/ her research idea or an idea of a functional or artistic or pedagogic project in seminars and acts as an opponent of the research idea/ plan and text of his fellow students. Students complete an online course in information retrieval. The student works on the thesis and presents its progress and the final thesis in seminars.

Further information

intra.turkuamk.fi/ itslearning/ Opinnäytetyö EMKO 2022-2023

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment methods and criteria

-participation in organized lectures and supervised courses and in processing of other theses and theses,
-conclusion of the thesis plan and the thesis agreement,
- study and report on others' theses in music (3 written and 2 artistic/functional theses)
-working as an opponent
-presenting your thesis at different stages of it

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

The student does not manage the core competencies of the study course in a manner that meets minimum requirements.

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

The student demonstrates his/her mastery of the study course's core competencies in a manner that meets the minimum requirements. The student has participated in the required group assignments and evaluation discussions and completed the learning tasks required in the study course successfully.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

The student demonstrates that he/she masters the core competencies of the study course well. The student has participated in the required group assignments and evaluation discussions and completed the learning tasks required in the study course successfully. The student is able to direct his/her own work in a self-directed, goal-oriented and responsible manner.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

The student demonstrates his/her mastery of the core competencies of the study course commendably/excellently. The student has participated in the required group assignments and evaluation discussions and completed the learning tasks required in the study course successfully. The student is able to direct his/her own work in a self-directed, goal-oriented and responsible manner. The student demonstrates profound competence of the study course objectives.