Upcoming implementations:

•   Public Finances and International Economy KH00BT58-3001 01.01.2022-31.07.2022  5 credits  (PLIITS20mar, ...) +-
  Teacher(s) in charge

  Anne Leinovaara-Matomäki

  Learning material

  Informed at the beginning of the study unit.

  Learning methods

  Innovation pedagogy, PBL.

  Objects, timing and methods of assessment

  Only those tasks that are returned on time, before the final deadline, are evaluated and can be accepted ! Late returns are not qualified. Please note that Urkund- Plagiarism detection can be used, so use citations and references correctly (according to any standard you wish e.g. Harvard, TUAS etc.)
  Scale : 0- 5
  • Fail (0)
  There are clear mistakes in the returned tasks, or something is missing (e.g. video-presentation, peer comments etc.) or the tasks returned are very limited. Or the deadlines are neglected. References are limited or poorly used.
  • Satisfactory (1-2)
  All the task are returned on time and they reach satisfactory level, but they are limited / narrow and lacking deep analysis. Or the references are very limited. Presentations limited. The amount of tools & theories used is limited. Self- and peer-evaluation(when and if asked) is limited.
  • Good (3-4)
  All the tasks are analytical, and well done. They represent high quality in terms of references, length and deep analysis. And in comparison to other group members there are clear bonus aspects. Also presentations are of high quality. And the peer comments are constructive and analytical (when asked). Above the minimum requirements in every way. The amount of used tools & theories is large. Self- and peer-evaluation (when and if asked) is analytical, deep, reflective and constructive.
  
  • Excellent (5)
  All the tasks are excellent. And results are even higher than in the grade 3-4. Presentations extremely high quality as well as peer comments. Well above all the other requirements ( in length, deep analysis etc.). Lots of references, all the tools & theories used (or at least most of them). Self- and peer-evaluation (when and if asked) is analytical, deep, reflective and constructive.

  Teaching language

  Finnish

  Timing

  01.01.2022 - 31.07.2022

  Enrollment date range

  01.12.2021 - 15.01.2022

  Group(s)

  • PLIITS20mar
  • PLIITS20MWL
  • PLIITS20taha

  Seats

  10 - 110

  Responsible unit

  Liiketalous (not translated)

  Teachers and responsibilities

  Lecturer: Anne Leinovaara-Matomäki

  Additional information

  -

  Degree Programme(s)

  Degree Programme in Business

  Campus

  Kupittaa Campus

  RDI share

  2 credits

  Share of online studies

  5 credits

  Assessment scale

  H-5

  Alternative methods of attainment for implementation

  No optional methods.

  Exam dates and retake possibilities

  Sovitaan kurssin aikana tarkemmin. (not translated)

  Pedagogic approaches

  Innovation pedagogy, PBL.

  Student's schedule and workload

  5 ects. Detailled instructions in the beginning of the study unit.

  Content scheduling

  5 ects. Hybrid-method.

  Assessment criteria

  Failed (0)

  Only those tasks that are returned on time, before the final deadline, are evaluated and can be accepted ! Late returns are not qualified. Please note that Urkund- Plagiarism detection can be used, so use citations and references correctly (according to any standard you wish e.g. Harvard, TUAS etc.)
  Scale : 0- 5
  • Fail (0)
  There are clear mistakes in the returned tasks, or something is missing (e.g. video-presentation, peer comments etc.) or the tasks returned are very limited. Or the deadlines are neglected. References are limited or poorly used.

  Assessment criteria – satisfactory (1-2)

  Only those tasks that are returned on time, before the final deadline, are evaluated and can be accepted ! Late returns are not qualified. Please note that Urkund- Plagiarism detection can be used, so use citations and references correctly (according to any standard you wish e.g. Harvard, TUAS etc.)
  Scale : 0- 5
  
  • Satisfactory (1-2)
  All the task are returned on time and they reach satisfactory level, but they are limited / narrow and lacking deep analysis. Or the references are very limited. Presentations limited. The amount of tools & theories used is limited. Self- and peer-evaluation(when and if asked) is limited.

  Assessment criteria – good (3-4)

  Only those tasks that are returned on time, before the final deadline, are evaluated and can be accepted ! Late returns are not qualified. Please note that Urkund- Plagiarism detection can be used, so use citations and references correctly (according to any standard you wish e.g. Harvard, TUAS etc.)
  
  • Good (3-4)
  All the tasks are analytical, and well done. They represent high quality in terms of references, length and deep analysis. And in comparison to other group members there are clear bonus aspects. Also presentations are of high quality. And the peer comments are constructive and analytical (when asked). Above the minimum requirements in every way. The amount of used tools & theories is large. Self- and peer-evaluation (when and if asked) is analytical, deep, reflective and constructive.

  Assessment criteria – excellent (5)

  Only those tasks that are returned on time, before the final deadline, are evaluated and can be accepted ! Late returns are not qualified. Please note that Urkund- Plagiarism detection can be used, so use citations and references correctly (according to any standard you wish e.g. Harvard, TUAS etc.)
  Scale : 0- 5
  
  • Excellent (5)
  All the tasks are excellent. And results are even higher than in the grade 3-4. Presentations extremely high quality as well as peer comments. Well above all the other requirements ( in length, deep analysis etc.). Lots of references, all the tools & theories used (or at least most of them). Self- and peer-evaluation (when and if asked) is analytical, deep, reflective and constructive.

•    01.01.1970-01.01.1970 +-
  Timing

  01.01.1970 - 01.01.1970

•    01.01.1970-01.01.1970 +-
  Timing

  01.01.1970 - 01.01.1970

• Show all (3) Hide