Opinto-opas

Tavoitteet

The participants are able to describe manufacturing techniques and are able to choose the most appropriate technique based on resource efficiency. The participants are able to run basic plastics processing devices and able to plan and execute trials. The participants are able to describe the effect of temperature and output on polymers’ rheology.

Sisältö

The students familiarise themselves with typical plastics manufacturing techniques emphasizing resource efficiency and circular economies. The students learn to plan and execute processing trials of plastics. The students familiarize themselves with rheology of polymer melt.

Issues: plastics processing techniques, operating plastics processing devices, such as extruder, injection moulding machine and 3D-printer, rheology of polymer melt.
The course is mainly a laboratory course with strong connection to topical RDI-project.

Oppimateriaalit

Materials in Teams
Students gather their own material.

Opetusmenetelmät

Project based learning
Task based learning
Research
Literature study
Web based material

Tenttien ajankohdat ja uusintamahdollisuudet

Week 9

Pedagogiset toimintatavat ja kestävä kehitys

International studies
Team learning
Based on working-life needs
Project work

Toteutuksen valinnaiset suoritustavat

Individual plans can be discussed and agreed together with Liisa Lehtinen.

Opiskelijan ajankäyttö ja kuormitus

The participants learn to use extruder and Injection moulding machines.
-The groups will manufacture test bars from plastic waste. Task includes following steps: working plan (Word), trial runs and test results (Excel) and report (PowerPoint).
-Test components for Selection of Materials course. Each group will manufacture at least 10 test bars and 10 meters filament for further testing.
-Rheology test with extruder

Sisällön jaksotus

Content:
Plastics prosessing tecnologies
Rheology
Injection moulding and extrusion runs in laboratory
Tensile testing.

If there are less than 10 participating students, the course will be organized as RDI-version. In that case the tasks will be connected to topical RDI-projects. Currently our projects are dealing with additive manufacturing (3D-prinitng) and degradation of biodegradable plastics..

Viestintäkanava ja lisätietoja

The course will be held in English.
Prerequisites: 2 years in chemical engineering studies or similar know-how, such as 2 years work in laboratory environment or in technical field or advanced syllabus in mathematics, physics and chemistry.

If there will be less than 10 participants, the course will be held as a part of RDI-project.

Arviointiasteikko

H-5

Arviointimenetelmät ja arvioinnin perusteet

Exam 30 %
Task 2 Theory of Processing methods Presentation 10 %
Task 3 Processing methods Presentation 10 %
Task 4 Extrusion and Injection moulding 30 %
Task, Reology 20 %

Hylätty (0)

All the documentation has not been returned and presented.
Reporting is written at the level that grade 1 can not be achieved.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1-2)

All documentation returned and presented. Some of the tasks might be returned late.
Reporting is not written clearly and/or have mistakes.
Work report is written at the level, where the reader can figure out at general level how the work that has been done but could not replicate it.
Team/student requires a lot of support to be able to work towards its goals.
Relevant theory can not be found from the reporting.
Team/student is able to perform the required tasks.

Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3-4)

All documentation returned and presented. Some of the tasks might be returned late.
Reporting is in general fluent and clear and may have only minor mistakes.
Work report is written at the level, where reader would almost be able to replicate the work based on the documenting.
Team/student is working towards its goals with support.
The progress of the work is regularly communicated to the stakeholders.
Some theory is presented and included in the reporting.
Team's/student's work is based on relevant theory.

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

Student has excellent attitude towards learning new things.
All documentation returned and presented according to schedule.
Reporting is fluent and clear and has no mistakes.
Work report is written at the level, where reader would be able to replicate the work based on the documenting.
Team/student is working independently towards its goals.
Relevant theory is presented and included in the reporting.
Team/student can find and apply relevant theory in the tasks.