Study guide
Please select the curriculum by the start year of studies and competence track.
Ajaya Joshi
Otieno Mbare
Otieno Mbare
Ajaya Joshi
Distance learning
en
1. Business to Business Marketing Management
Author: By Jim Blythe, Alan Zimmerman. Pages: 528 Size: 4.52 MB Format: PDF Publisher: Routledge Ltd. Published: 12 April, 2013 eISBN-13: 9780203067581
2. B2B Customer Experience : A Practical Guide to Delivering Exceptional CX Authors:Hague, Nick Hague, Paul N.Publication Information:Ed.: 1 Edition. New York, NY : Kogan Page. 201
100% Online
e-learning tools, discussions, team work, and presentations
The assessment is based on a scale of: 1 - 5
Active participation in team 10%
Individual assignment 40%
Team assignment 50%
English
18.10.2021 - 31.12.2021
01.06.2021 - 28.10.2021
15 - 40
More information to be given on the first all-group meeting.
Engineering and Business
Degree Programme in International Business (not translated)
Location-independent
5 credits
H-5
All assignments and tasks are done Online
students study in Small teams using:
Experiential learning, inquiry-based, case studies, collaborative, reflective, constructivism, and integrative
student workload = 133hrs
- Segmentation strategies in B2B
- Organizational buying behavior
- Relationship marketing
- Sales forecasting
- The Personal Selling Process and key competence in sales force
The work does not reach the standard level of the course. There is no evidence of further reading or considered thought about the subject matter neither clear demonstration of familiarity with the various B2B marketing concepts.
There is knowledge of core B2B marketing material and concepts but the knowledge and the processing of knowledge is weak or limited. There is only little evidence of wider reading.
The work is reasonably competent, though there may be some weaknesses. Knowledge of various B2B marketing concepts is adequate and while there is evidence of reading beyond the class, it's patchy or not broad (3).
The work is well developed beyond that given; demonstrates sound conceptual knowledge in B2B marketing and reasoning; depth and breadth of reading (4)
The work reflect very high conceptual standard and demonstrate knowledge in B2B concepts and autonomous development of reasoning processing well beyond that given in class. There is clear evidence of depth and breadth in reading.
Ajaya Joshi
Otieno Mbare
Distance learning
English
01.01.2022 - 31.07.2022
02.12.2021 - 31.12.2021
Liiketalous (not translated)
Degree Programme in International Business (not translated)
Location-independent
5 credits
H-5
Annika Karppelin
Emmanuel Querrec
Anne-Marie Jünger
Nicolas Le Grand
Ajaya Joshi
Päivi Nygren
Pia Lindgren
Distance learning
English
16.08.2021 - 02.08.2022
Liiketalous (not translated)
Degree Programme in International Business (not translated)
Kupittaa Campus
20 credits
H-5
Arto Manninen
Face-to-face
Reading of own choise regarding brand building (books, articles) either printed or on-line. Lecture materials. Goup work materials.
Lectures, literature, assignments, group work.
Book reflection pass/fail
Group work pass/fail during the course.
Exam 0-5
English
30.08.2021 - 10.10.2021
01.06.2021 - 06.09.2021
Liiketalous (not translated)
Degree Programme in Business, Degree Programme in International Business (not translated)
Kupittaa Campus
H-5
No alternative methods.
Re-take will be agreed separately.
Innovative pedagogy incl. field work outside classroom and presentations.
Book reflection, two assignments, exam = 133 hrs = 5 credits.
Student does not attend or shows poor activity during the course (reflection, group work). No knowldge of basics in the exam.
Has returned book reflection, has attended group work and has Basic command of materials reuired to the exam.
Has returned book reflection, has attended group work and has Good command of materials reuired to the exam
Has returned book reflection, has attended group work and has Exellent command of materials reuired to the exam
Arto Manninen
Face-to-face
Reading of own choise regarding brand building (books, articles) either printed or on-line. Lecture materials. Goup work materials.
Lectures, literature, assignments, group work.
Book reflection pass/fail
Group work pass/fail during the course.
Exam 0-5
English
18.10.2021 - 05.12.2021
01.06.2021 - 25.10.2021
0 - 60
Liiketalous (not translated)
Degree Programme in Business, Degree Programme in International Business (not translated)
Kupittaa Campus
H-5
No alternative methods.
Re-take will be agreed separately.
Innovative pedagogy incl. field work outside classroom and presentations.
Book reflection, two assignments, exam = 133 hrs = 5 credits.
Student does not attend or shows poor activity during the course (reflection, group work). No knowldge of basics in the exam.
Has returned book reflection, has attended group work and has Basic command of materials reuired to the exam.
Has returned book reflection, has attended group work and has Good command of materials reuired to the exam
Has returned book reflection, has attended group work and has Exellent command of materials reuired to the exam
Anniina Kolari
Pia Lindgren
Pia Lindgren
Anniina Kolari
Distance learning
Will be provided on course workspace. Use of all other relevant material is encouraged
Academic Writing: task-based, individual, online study materials, self-reflection
Business English Communication: task-based, individual research and reflection, interactive online meetings, team discussions and sharing video lectures and reading materials
Career documents: 0-4 p.
Individual Culture Project Video Presentation: 0-4 p.
Cover email: 0-4 p.
Individual Culture Project Report: 0-4 p.
Activity in meetings (peer feedback, participation in written online discussions, sharing of own expertise): 0-2 p.
Completing the tasks on itslearning will reflect positively on the final grade
English
25.08.2021 - 03.12.2021
02.07.2021 - 04.10.2021
20 - 40
Students who take an active part in and successfully complete the Business English Communication part of the course (integrated with Intercultural Communication for Global Work course), are eligible to apply for the digital badge 'Global Communicator':
Through faculty-led student education, the badge earner has demonstrated the ability to communicate and work in international environments in English. In addition, the badge earner has achieved an understanding of cultural frameworks, communication methods and tools for online and on-site global work.
Liiketalous (not translated)
Degree Programme in International Business (not translated)
Location-independent
5 credits
H-5
Student can complete the Academic Writing part (2ECTS) and complete Accreditation of Prior Learning based on Competence (not transfer of credits):
Two weeks prior to course start, student submits a written report showcasing expertise in academic writing skills. If the submission fulfills the assessment criteria, student can attain the credits. If the submission does not meet the criteria, student joins the course
Student can complete the Business English Communication part (3 ECTS) and complete Accreditation of Prior Learning based on Competence (not transfer of credits):
Two weeks prior to course start, student submits a video and a written report showcasing expertise in oral and written work place communication and professional communication. The report must include concrete examples of work place communication (e.g. meetings, negotiations, written reports, contracts, emails and so on). If the submission fulfills the assessment criteria, student can attain the credits. If the submission does not meet the criteria, student joins the course.
Pls see the course workspace for further details.
No examinations. Student can re-attempt the course by completing other missing parts of the course within one month of the course end.
Academic Writing: Personal objectives and independent study, Task-based assessment
Business English Communication: Personal objectives and independent study, Work life oriented learning assignments, Digital working environment as an authentic learning hub, Task-based assessment
135 hours of student work
Academic Writing: 2ECTS=54 hours of work, on average 10 hours per week. No online meetings.
Busienss English Communication: 3ECTS=81 hours of work, on average 8 hours per week. Live online meetings: 2x 1hour All Group Online Meetings on Zoom, and 2x 1hour Study team online meetings on MS Teams. (Meetings integrated with Intercultural Communication for Global Work course. Meetings are compulsory even if student takes only one of the courses)
Modules include study materials and practical activities and assignments.
Academic Writing: Aug-Sept (wk 35-40)
Business English Communication: Oct-Dec (wk 41-51)
Student did not complete required course assignments that show competence in course topics, did not participate in the online meetings to showcase competence in course topics or take an active part in the course to share expertise and learn from others.
The student can describe the importance of business communication skills in oral and written business context, and shows some ability to communicate in situations requiring business communication skills.
The student can describe and identify features of academic writing, elements of paragraph and essay structure, unity and coherence, is aware of ways to avoid plagiarism.
The student is able to describe the communication skills needed in oral and
written business contexts and demonstrates ability to communicate in various
business situations.
The student can produce text that contains some features of academic
writing, has some elements of paragraph and essay structure.
The student can produce text that displays a degree of unity and coherence. The student can reference sources and compile a reference list although
there are inconsistencies in the format and style.
The student is able to analyse different communicative situations in business and suggest ways of improving the communication in challenging situations. The student shows ability to adapt and adjust his/her communication style in various situations requiring professional communication skills.
The student can produce text that contains most features of academic writing, has well-developed elements of paragraph and essay structure.
The student can produce text that displays unity and coherence as well consistency throughout the essay.
The student can reference sources and compile a reference list in a consistent format and style.
Pia Lindman
Face-to-face
Kaliski: Business Mathematics, 3rd edition (eBook), chapters 2 (UNIT 1), 4 (UNIT 2), 8,9 (UNIT 4), 11 and 12 (UNIT 5)
Tutorials and assignments in ItsLearning/Wiris/ViLLE
Selected chapters in Khan Academy
Excel
Self studies, tutorials in virtual environment, assignments, study clinics, weekly assignments
ItsLearning/Wiris/ViLLE tests (5 tests) and Excel assignments
English
25.08.2021 - 19.12.2021
01.06.2021 - 30.09.2021
Liiketalous (not translated)
Degree Programme in International Business (not translated)
Location-independent
H-5
Self studies, tutorials in virtual environment, assignments, study clinics, weekly assignments
Total 133 hours:
All group meetings (5 hours), Tutorials, Assignments and ItsLearning/Wiris/ViLLE tests, self study
- Percentages and Taxation
- Sequences and Interest
- Investments
- Business Economy (investment calculations, VAT, Pricing, Cost Accounting, Contribution Margin, Profit)
- Value of the Money
- Excel
Tests in ItsLearning/Wiris/ViLLE (5 tests in total) not done with good enough level (40 % correct). Excel assignment(s) not returned.
1: Pass grade can be achieved passing ItsLearning/Wiris/ViLLE tests (40 % correct) and returning Excel assignment(s).
3: Grade can be achieved with ItsLearning/Wiris/ViLLE tests (about 60 % correct) and returning Excel assignment(s).
Grade can be achieved with ItsLearning/Wiris/ViLLE tests (about 90 % correct) and returning Excel assignment(s).
Anniina Kolari
Pia Lindgren
Anniina Kolari
Pia LIndgren
Distance learning
Personal choice depending on research topic (Contemporary topics in Dig Bus course); support material provided on the course platform
Individual work; Research, reporting and presenting in pairs and groups; Online meetings in groups and individually.
Individual research and reflection
Interactive online meetings
Team discussions and sharing
Reading materials
Individual Research Project (integrated with Contemporary Topics in Dig Bus)
Reflective essay on personal communication
Self, peer and teacher feedback and assessment; report, presentation, reflective essay on personal communication, attendance in online meetings.
English
27.01.2022 - 29.04.2022
02.12.2021 - 31.12.2021
20 - 40
Liiketalous (not translated)
Degree Programme in International Business (not translated)
Location-independent
5 credits
H-5
Student can complete the course by utilising the materials on the course and implementing theory in practice in an authentic case in the workplace. Student must present the outcomes of the research and study in the course learning environment in the required format to share expertise. Student must take part in communicating and meeting with teachers/team members in a chosen digital platform(s).
Alternative attainments should be discussed with teacher tutor beforehand
No examinations. Student can re-attempt the course by completing the missing parts of the course within one month of the course end.
innovation pedagogy; international and work-life oriented task-based teamwork
Partial integration with the course 'Contemporary Topics in Digital Business'
Individual study supported by peer discussions and teacher guidance
Work life oriented communication focus
International digital working environment as an authentic learning hub
Co-teaching in sharing expert views
Task-based assessment
5ECTS, 135 hours student work
-research
-reporting
-presenting
-working as pairs
-discussing in teams
- Write to inform, influence and persuade by making use of field-specific sources
- Share information in a field-specific community as part of a professional profile
- Present information to create interest and to convince an audience
- Make use of modern communication tools used in working life
- Communicate in English as a professional in academic and business contexts.
This course is closely integrated with Contemporary Topics in Digital Business
27.1- 21.4.2022
Student did not complete required course assignments that show competence in course topics, did not participate in the online meetings to showcase competence in course topics or take an active part in the course to share expertise and learn from others.
The student shows ability to communicate in demanding situations requiring professional business communication skills but the style, register, vocabulary are somewhat limited.
The student demonstrates adequate ability to communicate in demanding professional business situations. The student is able to give and receive constructive feedback on personal communication competence in team-based contexts.The student is able to give well-argued reflection on the learning process
The student is able to analyse and react appropriately in field-specific communicative situations. The student is able to adapt and adjust his/her communication style and suggest ways of improving the communication in different demanding professional situations. Well-argued feedback to others and on personal reflection
Anne-Marie Jünger
Jaana Merikallio
Distance learning
Will be published in Itslearning.
Webinars, guest speaker presentations, pair research, presenting findings of the research, and commentaries.
Fail (0pts), Good (1pts) and Excellent (2pts)
- 1 pair research + presentation: 4 points maximum.
- the research paper and presentation are graded 0-1-2.
- 2 pair reviews: 2 maximum points each
OR inviting and introducing a guest speaker = no pair review needed.
- Individual performance, active participation and attendance: 2 points.
- To pass the course you need to attend minimum 4sessions.
- The students can get a maximum of altogether 10 points.
The points translate as follow for the final grade:
4 points or below: failed
5-6 points= 1
7 points= 2
8 points = 3
9 points = 4
10 points = 5
Please note that: Missing a deadline equals 0 points (medical certificate accepted).
You can change your research presentation date under the following circumstances:
- You find an empty time slot in the calendar
- You are able to agree to swap the date with another pair
- You inform the teachers about the change at least one month in advance
- In case of emergency, the other pair member is to present on your behalf
English
04.10.2021 - 17.12.2021
01.06.2021 - 08.09.2021
Will be published in Itslearning.
Engineering and Business
Degree Programme in International Business (not translated)
Location-independent
5 credits
H-5
No exams.
Learning by doing, flipped learning, research-based, active participative observation, critical evaluation and problem-based learning,
Seminar: Participation, preparation and presentation: 20 hours
Theme selection and proposal: 10 hours
Research: 20 hours
Peer reviews: 6 hours
Pair Assignments and self-studies: 80 hours
Contemporary Topics in Digital Business course will provide you with a unique opportunity to explore and gain cross-disciplinary knowledge from multi-dimensional digital world i.e. e-business, SoMe marketing, artificial intelligence, SEO, payment transactions, sustainable development, to name a few. In this course, students will explore an area of personal interest by researching and present research findings during the seminars.
Upon completion of the course, students will become well acquainted with important topics within the digital business sphere. In addition, students will become aware of potential opportunities and challenges caused by dynamic digital phenomena.
This course is divided into 6 online sessions (webinars).
Each session will begin with the presentation of a key theme (by a student pair or a guest speaker).
One of the key deliverables is that each student pair will write an article on the chosen interest area/theme. During the webinar, two student pairs will present research findings.
0= Passive or no participation throughout the course. Failure to attend minimum 4 sessions. The student shows very limited knowledge and understanding of the major themes covered in the course as well as an inability to grasp fundamental principles digital business. Zero or insignificant contribution during the webinars and completion of pair assignments. Student shows very little ability to gather and interpret relevant secondary data to meet or reach objectives and come to informed judgments that include reflection about what was agreed during the proposal. The student has difficulties in communicating his/her ideas to others. Most part of assignments is unclear.
Limited participation throughout the course duration. The student demonstrates limited knowledge and understanding of the main themes covered during the course. The student shows difficulties in applying his/her knowledge and understanding of the content. Basic understanding of chosen research theme and limited ability to gather and interpret relevant secondary data to meet or reach objectives and come to informed judgments that include reflection about what was agreed during the proposal. The student has difficulties in communicating his/her ideas to others. Some parts of the text are unclear.
Good participation throughout the course duration, and encourages (support) other study team members in identifying new possibilities in a theme they have selected. Good understanding of overall research theme and its future application. Demonstrate good ability to gather and interpret relevant secondary data to fulfil research objectives and come to informed judgments that include reflection about what was agreed during the proposal. The student is able to communicate his/her ideas to others. Important parts of the text are clear and well written.
Excellent participant throughout the course duration, and encourages (support/guide) other study team members. Student shows a clear understanding of the major themes covered and presented during the course as well its future potential and limitations The student clearly demonstrates how to gather and interpret relevant data to fulfil the research objective. The student is able to communicate clearly his/her ideas to others in a professional way. Most of the text is clear and well written.
Kai Schleutker
Distance learning
- e-book(s) and articles
- lessons material and one's own notes
- Google Analytics tutorial videos
- contact lessons: active participation, presentations
- group assignments (assessing & improving Web presence;
- Google Digital Marketing Fundamentals Certificate
Exam (individual): 10% (0-5)
Display campaign (individual): 30% (0-5)
SEO assignment (group): 20% (0-5)
Digital strategy (group): 40% (0-5)
Compulsory, but no effect on grade: Google Analytics for Beginners Certificate
INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENTS:
Exam 10%, multiply exam grade by 2:
0: (0 pt)
0,5: 1/10 answers correct (1 points)
1: 2/10 answers correct (2pts)
1,5: 3/10 correct answers (3 points)
2: 4/10 answers correct (4 pts)
2,5: 5/10 answers correct (5 points)
3: 6/10 answers correct (6 pts)
3,5: 7/10 answers correct (7 points)
4: 8/10 answers correct (8 pts)
4,5: 9/10 answers correct (9 points)
5: 10/10 answers correct (10 pts)
Plan and buy a display campaign (30%), multiply assignment grade by 6:
0: The assignment hasn’t been returned in time. The campaign mathematics (the correct cpm price, the correct cpm x impressions calculation) are wrong. The campaign period per media is missing.
1-2: The campaign has been built according to instructions, and mathematics are correct, but campaign consists of only one media. No argumentation why the media is chosen.
3-4: The campaign includes two or more media, mathematics are correct and the campaign has been built according to instructions. Student provides arguments for their solutions and exhibits media cards / price sources clearly.
5: The campaign includes two or more media, mathematics are correct and campaign has been built according to instructions. Student provides arguments for his/her solutions, which demonstrate expertise.
GROUP ASSIGNMENTS:
1st Assignment: Website traffic and how to increase it (20%), multiply assignment grade by 4:
0: The assignment hasn’t been returned in time. The references and tools haven’t been used, or the evaluation and suggestions are incorrect. The work shows that the group has not understood the meaning of search engine optimization.
1-2: The evaluation doesn’t cover all the required aspects. The use of references is insufficient.
3-4: All the required aspects are covered and the use of references is sufficient and correct.
5: The evaluation shows that the group has a very good understanding of the topic: evaluation shows in-depth understanding of SEO. Use of references is versatile and correct.
2nd = Final Assignment: Build a digital marketing strategy for a small company (40%), multiply points by 8:
0: The assignment hasn’t been returned in time. The elements of the strategy are irrelevant, ie. don’t belong to a strategy. It doesn’t include the elements discussed in the course. References aren’t used.
1-2: The strategy is very limited, and the instructions are followed only partially. The elements are few and loose and don’t build up to a logical entity. The use of references is limited and only partly correct. The work does not demonstrate research and commitment to the work. The presentation is below average verbally and visually.
3-4: The strategy contains all the elements needed. The work shows that students understand the essentials of the digital marketing strategy. The elements form a logical entity without any gaps, and references are used correctly and sufficiently. The chosen actions support the objectives, and several, high quality references are used. The presentation is on satisfactory level.
5: The work demonstrates an in-depth understanding of digital marketing strategy work. All the aspects are covered in a professional way, the strategy is diverse. The references are versatile, and the presentation is of high quality.
In final group assignment: when assessing the performance of an individual student, peer evaluation (within a group) is in use. In other words, the student's own grade may differ from the one of the group's, depending on the group members' evaluation.
FINAL COURSE GRADE SCALE:
0-25: fail
26-49: 1
50-64: 2
65-79: 3
80-90: 4
91-100: 5
Degree of student's participation and activity in classes can raise or lower the grade.
English
30.08.2021 - 20.12.2021
01.06.2021 - 06.09.2021
Engineering and Business
Degree Programme in Business, Degree Programme in International Business (not translated)
Location-independent
5 credits
H-5
Learning in teams, in interaction with others, self and peer evaluation, digital learning.
- Contact lessons 4h
- Group work 3 x 10 hours = 30 h
- Individual studying, including Google Digital Marketing Fundamentals 70 h
-
30.08-31.10.2021
- Intro, recap marketing fundamentals
- The benefits of digital marketing
- Traditional vs. digital marketing
- Inbound vs. outbound:
o learn 'digital language' and get familiar with digital environments
o how to assess and improve web-presence
o traffic sources, how to increase traffic
- targeting, buyer personas
- buyer´s journey
- SEO, SEM
- earning the Google Digital Marketing Fundamentals Certificate
0-25 points. See the criteria above "Arvioinnin kohteet, ajoitus ja menetelmät" / "Objects, timing and methods of assessment"
26-64 points. See the criteria above "Arvioinnin kohteet, ajoitus ja menetelmät" / "Objects, timing and methods of assessment"
65-90 points. See the criteria above "Arvioinnin kohteet, ajoitus ja menetelmät" / "Objects, timing and methods of assessment"
91-100 points. See the criteria above "Arvioinnin kohteet, ajoitus ja menetelmät" / "Objects, timing and methods of assessment"
Mikko Siitonen
Nicolas Le Grand
Distance learning
English
01.08.2021 - 31.12.2021
01.06.2021 - 30.09.2021
Engineering and Business
Degree Programme in International Business (not translated)
Location-independent
1 credits
H-5
Nicolas Le Grand
Nicolas Le Grand
nicolas.legrand@turkuamk.fi
Distance learning
Course Book:
Dessler, Gary (2019). Human Resource Management, 16th edition, Harlow: Pearson Education.
OR
Dessler, Gary (2017). Human Resource Management, 15th edition, Harlow: Pearson Education.
Reading materials in Itslearning
This course is implemented fully online.
Each study week is composed of the following elements:
1. Studying the assigned chapter(s) from the course book
2. Case study in pairs and peer review or study team discussion
3. Feedback and Wrap-up from the lecturer every week
All the components (pair assignments, pair assignment reviews…) of this course will be graded as follow:
Fail (0pts)
Good (1pts)
Excellent (2pts)
4 pair assignments: 8 points maximum
3 pair assignment reviews: 6 points maximum
3 team discussions: 6 points maximum
A student can get a maximum of altogether 20 points.
The points translate as follow for the final grade:
0-8 points: failed; 9-10 points: 1; 11-12 points: 2; 13-14 points: 3; 15-16 points: 4; 17-20 points: 5
Please note that missing a deadline equals 0 points (unless medical certificate).
English
07.03.2022 - 24.04.2022
22.11.2021 - 28.02.2022
15 - 45
This course has 45 seats: 25 seats are reserved for TUAS students and 20 seats are reserved for campus online students.
Liiketalous (not translated)
Degree Programme in Business, Degree Programme in International Business (not translated)
Location-independent
5 credits
H-5
This course is completed through assignments and there is no exam.
Flipped learning, case study based.
Studying the 8 assigned Chapters: 60 hours
4 pair assignments: 50 hours
3 pair assignment reviews: 10 hours
3 Team discussions (preparation and the actual discussion): 10 hours
The 1st deadline is on March 13th and there will be weekly deadlines until April 24th. The course environment will open two weeks before the first deadline. The study teams and the student pairs will be formed prior to the start of the course.
Introduction and key concepts
HRM strategy and analysis
Job analysis and the talent management process
Personnel planning and testing
Interviewing candidates
Training and developing employees
Performance management and appraisal
The student has demonstrated very limited knowledge and understanding of the main areas of the course. The student shows difficulties in applying his/her knowledge and understanding of the course content. The student demonstrates very little ability to gather and interpret relevant data to inform judgments that include reflection about what is asked for the assignments. The student has difficulties in communicating his/her ideas in writing to the reader. Several parts of the text are unclear.
The student has demonstrated limited knowledge and understanding of the main areas of the course. The student shows some difficulties in applying his/her knowledge and understanding of the course content. The student demonstrates little ability to gather and interpret relevant data to inform judgments that include reflection about what is asked for the assignments. The student has difficulties in communicating his/her ideas in writing to the reader. Some parts of the text are unclear.
The student has demonstrated good knowledge and understanding of the main areas of the course. The student shows s/he can apply his/her knowledge and understanding of the course content. The student demonstrates good ability to gather and interpret relevant data to inform judgments that include reflection about what is asked for the assignments. The student is able to communicate his/her ideas in writing to the reader. Important parts of the text are clear and well written.
The student has demonstrated very good knowledge and understanding of the main areas of the course. The student shows s/he can apply his/her knowledge and understanding of the course content. The student demonstrates very good ability to gather and interpret relevant data to inform judgments that include reflection about what is asked for the assignments. The student is able to communicate clearly his/her ideas in writing to the reader in a professional way. Most of the text is clear and well written.
Anniina Kolari
Pia Lindgren
Pia Lindgren
Distance learning
provided in course workspace. all other material recommended.
Individual research and reflection
Interactive online meetings
Team discussions and sharing
Video lectures and reading materials
Individual Culture Project
Reflective Learning Diary
Career documents: 0-4 p.
Individual Culture Project Video Presentation: 0-4 p.
Cover email: 0-4 p.
Individual Culture Project Report: 0-4 p.
Activity in meetings (peer feedback, participation in written online discussions, sharing of own expertise): 0-2 p.
Completing the tasks on itslearning will reflect positively on the final grade
English
25.08.2021 - 03.12.2021
02.07.2021 - 03.10.2021
15 - 40
Students who take an active part in and successfully complete the course, are eligible to apply for the digital badge 'Global Communicator':
Through faculty-led student education, the badge earner has demonstrated the ability to communicate and work in international environments in English. In addition, the badge earner has achieved an understanding of cultural frameworks, communication methods and tools for online and on-site global work.
Liiketalous (not translated)
Degree Programme in International Business (not translated)
Location-independent
5 credits
H-5
Student can complete the Individual Culture Project by utilising the materials on the course and implementing the cultural theories in an authentic case in the workplace. Student must present the outcomes of the research and study in the course learning environment in the required format to share expertise. Student must take part in communicating and meeting with team members in a chosen digital platform(s).
Accreditation of Prior Learning based on Competence (not transfer of credits):
Two weeks prior to course start, student submits a video and a written report showcasing expertise in the aforementioned course topics:
Cultural awareness, Cultural identity, Working with Cultures, Communicating with Cultures, Cultural Theories, Intercultural Teams, Culture in the media, Exploring cultures. If the submission fulfils the assessment criteria, student can attain the credits. If the submission does not meet the criteria, student joins the course.
No examinations. Student can re-attempt the course by submitting the Individual Culture Project or by completing other missing parts of the course within one month of the course end.
Interactive and collaborative team-based study
Work life oriented learning assignments and Culture Project
International digital working environment as an authentic learning hub
Co-teaching in sharing expert views
Task-based assessment
135 hours of student work divided into 10 weeks of study and 5 modules, on average 25 hours per module. Modules include a theoretical framework, practical application related to Individual Culture Project and a self-reflection. Face-to-face sessions: 2x 1hour All Group Online Meetings on Zoom, and 2x 1hour Study team online meetings on MS Teams.
After the course, the student can:
-describe own cultural identity
-utilise cultural frameworks to understand cultural concepts
-adapt communication in culturally diverse contexts
-work as a member of a culturally diverse team
-utilise knowledge on business cultures in work-related situations
-execute a cultural project to showcase application of theories in a practical context
-Cultural Awareness and Cultural Identity
- Intercultural Teams
-Communicating with Cultures
-Working with Cultures
-Exploring cultures through media and projects
Modules include theoretical frameworks, practical application related to Individual Culture Project and a self-reflection.
Cultural Awareness: Student understands the concept of cultural identity and the importance of understanding other cultures. The student is able to describe his/her cultural identity.
Theoretical frameworks on culture: The student is able to identify main concepts from cultural frameworks.
Intercultural communication: The student can describe the importance of intercultural communication skills in social and business situations, and shows some ability to use them.
Working in international teams: The student understands the need for intercultural awareness and cross-cultural communication skills in international teams. The student participates in intercultural team work.
Business cultures: The student is able to describe the importance of understanding business cultures in different national contexts.
Cultural Awareness: The student is able to describe different ways of interpreting culture and cultural awareness, such as iceberg or culture onion. The student can analyse his/her own cultural identity in relation to the values, customs and practices of other cultures.
Theoretical frameworks on culture: The student is able to describe the frameworks and shows understanding of how they can be used in practice.
Intercultural communication: The student is able to describe the communication skills needed in intercultural situations and demonstrates ability to use them in practice.
Working in international teams: The student can describe challenges and benefits of working in and leading intercultural teams. The student is an active member of an intercultural team and demonstrates ability to communicate and function as a member of an international team.
Business cultures: The student can explain business practices of different cultures and is able to identify challenges relating to his/her own culture in doing business in another culture.
Cultural Awareness: The student is able to analyse how national and organizational cultures build cultural identity, and can demonstrate cultural sensitivity and appreciation of other cultures in intercultural encounters.
Theoretical frameworks on culture: The student is able to explain the concept and significance of the frameworks. In addition, the student is able to apply the frameworks in case and authentic situations.
Intercultural communication: The student is able to analyse breaks in communication due to cultural factors and can suggest ways of improving the communicative approach to the situation. The student shows ability to adapt and adjust his/her communication style in various intercultural situations.
Working in international teams: The student can apply different frameworks in order to enhance work in a culturally diverse team. The student is fully capable of working as part of an international team and is able to take into account the effect of cultures on teamwork and in leading a team.
Business cultures: The student is able to apply his/her knowledge of business cultures in authentic and case situations. The student is able to analyse and suggest approaches to intercultural business situations.
Ajaya Joshi
Ajaya Joshi
Distance learning
Will be available in Optima
Gerald Albaum., E. D., 2011. International Marketing and Export Management. Seventh ed. Essex: Pearson Education.
Hollensen, S., 2016. Global Marketing. Seventh. ed. London: Pearson Education.
James X. Zhan, R. B., 2015. world Investment Report, Geneva: United Nations Publication.
The students study the theoretical background at home (cf. reading to be completed prior to every workshop)
The students will watch prerecorded video of chapter summaries
The contact hours are mainly used to review group assignments and workshops.
BYOD for each “lecture” as the course book & internet access are needed to do the case studies
Attendance: (Small team meetings/ All group meetings
1 pts (75% compulsory attn.)
course will be graded as follow:
Fail (0pts), Good (1pts) and Excellent (2pts)
2 Group discussions: 4 points maximum
3 Pair assignments: 6 points
2 Individual assignments: 4 points maximum
Pair presentation: 1 point
The students can get a maximum of altogether 12 points.
The points translate as follow for the final grade:
0-5 points: fail; 6 points: 1; 7 points: 2; 8 points: 3; 9-10 points; 4; 11-12 points: 5
English
18.10.2021 - 31.12.2021
01.06.2021 - 31.10.2021
All the components (individual assignments, peer reviews…) of this course will be graded as follow:
Fail (0pts), Good (1pts) and Excellent (2pts)
2 Group discussions: 4 points maximum
3 Pair assignments: 6 points
2 Individual assignments: 4 points maximum
Pair presentation: 1 point
Attendance: 1 point
The students can get a maximum of altogether 12 points.
The points translate as follow for the final grade:
0-5 points: fail; 6 points: 1; 7 points: 2; 8 points: 3; 9-10 points; 4; 11-12 points: 5
Please note that:
Missing a deadline equals 0 points (medical certificate accepted)
The two individual assignments and the team assignment are compulsory to do to be able to pass the course. Missing an impromptu test or a peer review is not disqualifying, it only affects negatively the final grade.
Engineering and Business
Degree Programme in International Business (not translated)
Location-independent
5 credits
H-5
Independent studies, flipped learning, case study analysis, online live team discussions, and project-based learning.
15 Hours (Online small team and all team meetings)
70 hours: (Reading course materials and application of Internationalization marketing frameworks)
25 hours: (group assignment research and writing)
10 hours: (case study preparations)
Chapter 1 (Week 43): Course introduction, group formation
Trends in International business: FDI flow, globalization, the LSEs and SMEs
Chapter 3 (Week 44): Internationalization theories
Chapter 4 (Week 45): Assessing firm’s international competitiveness
Chapter 5 (Week 46): Global Market Research (all group session)
Chapter 8 (Week 47): The international market selection process (Case Nano)
Chapter 10 (Week 48) :Export modes and Intermediate Entry Modes
Product showcase (Week 49) : all group session, portfolio presentation and feedback
Passive or no participation throughout the course. The student show very limited knowledge and understanding of the main areas of the course as well as inability to grasp fundamental international marketing theories and inability apply theories in project work. Zero or insignificant contribution in completion of team assignments. Student show very little ability to gather and interpret relevant data to come to informed judgments that include reflection about what is asked for the assignments. The student has difficulties in communicating his/her ideas to others. Several parts of the text are unclear.
Limited participation throughout the course duration and contribution towards the completion of team assignments. The student can demonstrate limited knowledge and understanding of the main areas of the course. The student shows difficulties in applying his/her knowledge and understanding of the content. Basic understanding of International marketing theories, and limited ability apply knowledge into practice. The student has difficulties in communicating his/her ideas to others. Some parts of the text are unclear
Good participation throughout the course duration, and encourages (support) other study team members in contributing towards the team assignments. Good understanding of key International marketing theories, and able to demonstrate how to apply theoretical knowledge into practice. The student demonstrates good ability to gather and interpret relevant data to inform judgments that include reflection about what is asked for the assignments. The student is able to communicate his/her ideas to others. Important parts of the text are clear and well written.
Excellent participant throughout the course duration, and encourages (support/guide) other study team members in contributing towards the team assignments. Excellent understanding of key International marketing theories, and able to demonstrate, apply theoretical knowledge into practice with valuable findings. The student ability to gather and interpret relevant data to is consistent thought the course duration. The student is able to communicate clearly his/her ideas to others in a professional way. Most of the text is clear and well written.
Maria Välivirta Havia
Arto Manninen
Distance learning
A book for pre-assignment: Osterwalder A. et al 2010. Business model generation: a handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers (eBook)
Chan W.C & Mauborgne, R. 2015 Blue ocean strategy: how to create uncontested market space and make the competition irrelevant (eBook)
Other materials will be given in ItsLearning.
Briefings, Lecture, Written material, Teacher/student interaction (Q&A´ sessions) and individual work
Individual work is a business report + video summary (breadth and quality of content, facts supporting findings, quality of report).
Pre-assignment and book report must be passed.
Pre-assignment grade: fail - pass
Book report (team or pair) grade: fail - pass
Business analysis report (individual work) - grade fail / 1-5
English
30.08.2021 - 20.12.2021
01.06.2021 - 16.09.2021
Engineering and Business
Degree Programme in Business, Degree Programme in International Business (not translated)
Location-independent
5 credits
H-5
No alternatives.
No exam.
Briefings and lecture(s). Joint sessions and interaction, individual work.
Individual works (business models summary, business analysis report)
Book report (team or pair)
Participation of lecture (video), participation of briefings and joint discussions, group and individual project (work total 133 hrs).
This course contains topics like CRM and Business models which will form the main frame of the course. CRM being the marketing entity and business models - as it says - the "big picture". After the course student is able to understand landscape of digital business and have tools to analyze how companies operate in business.
The course start 9.9.2021 (1st AGM) till mid Nov.
No Project work delivered.
Report do present results but there is lack factual foundation, it is superficial and not well argued for. Used language, structure, style and content of returned report is moderate.
Report include results which are well presented, are based on facts and are well argued for. Reports include some analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the work done. Work is based on the theoretical content and models presented in the course. Work shows critical thinking, suggested business analysis tools and source materials are well used. Good structure, style, and content of returned report.
Report is high quality content wise. Content contains in-depth analysis, fact based argumentation and adequate critique of the results presented. Results have a direct link to the theoretical content and models presented in the course. Excellent structure, style, and content of returned report. All produced materials are showing excellent quality, suggested business analysis tools are used and conclusions made. Source and additional materials are widely used. Works shows critical thinking.
Arto Manninen
Taru Kankaanpää
Arto Manninen
Taru Kankaanpää (not translated)
Face-to-face
Chan, K.W. & al. 2015. Sinisen meren strategia. Löydä markkina-alue kilpailun ulkopuolelta. Laajennettu painos. Talentum. (löytyy painettuna ja ekirjana)
Chan, K.W. & al. 2015 Blue ocean strategy. How to create uncontested market space and make the competition irrelevant.(löytyy painettuna ja ekirjana)
Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y. 2010.Business model generation: a handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. (löytyy painettuna ja ekirjana)
Luentomateriaalit, muut mahdolliset artikkelit ja videot. (not translated)
Luennot ja ryhmissä sekä itsenäisesti tehtävät harjoitukset. (not translated)
Harjoitustehtävät on tehty hyväksytysti ja ne edesauttavat loppuraportin tekemistä. Arviointi perustuu loppuraporttiin ja sen esitykseen yhteisellä arvosanalla (0-5).
Harjoitustehtävien ja loppuraportin palauttaminen myöhässä vaikuttaa arviointiin.
Plagiointi ja tekstin suora kopiointi nettilähteistä tai kirjoista johtaa automaattisesti tehtävän hylkäämiseen. (not translated)
Finnish
02.09.2021 - 30.11.2021
01.06.2021 - 30.09.2021
0 - 50
Engineering and Business
Degree Programme in Business, Degree Programme in International Business (not translated)
Kupittaa Campus
H-5
Ei tenttiä (not translated)
Luennot ja opiskelijoiden itsenäinen työskentely. (not translated)
Kurssin vaatima työmäärä vastaa 5 op työmäärää. (not translated)
Kurssi alkaa ennakkotehtävällä ja tapaamiset alkavat viikolla 37.
Digitaalinen liiketoiminta ja sen tuomat mahdollisuudet. Liiketoimintamallien murros ja moderni asiakkuuksien hallinta. Liiketoimintamallien tarkastelun periaatteet. Tarkempi aikataulu ilmoitetaan kurssin kuluessa. (not translated)
Tehtäviä ja loppuraporttia ei ole tehty hyväksytysti. (not translated)
Opiskelija tunnistaa erilaiset liiketoiminta- ja asiakkuudenhoitomallit ja osaa kirjoittaa niistä raportin.
Kaikki oppimistehtävät on suoritettu hyväksytysti. (not translated)
Opiskelija ymmärtää erilaiset liiketoiminta- ja asiakkuudenhoitomallit ja analysoi kriittisesti konsepteja.
Kaikki tehtävät on palautettu ajallaan ohjeistuksen mukaan.
Tuotokset ovat selkeitä, perusteltuja ja sisältävät lähdemateriaalia. (not translated)
Opiskelija ymmärtää syvällisesti liiketoiminta- ja asiakkuudenhoitomallit ja pystyy analysoimaan ja tekemään omia johtopäätöksiä ja ehdotuksia konsepteihin.
Kaikki tehtävät on tehty ammattimaisesti hyvin perustellen ja ne osoittavat kykyä yhdistää monipuolista lähdemateriaalia ja omaa pohdintaa. (not translated)
Anne Leinovaara-Matomäki
Lecturer: Anne Leinovaara-Matomäki
NOTE: This course is only for PINBOS students.
Distance learning
Cheeseman, H. R. (2016) book "Contemporary Business Law". Available as an ebook in Finna.
Learning materials for the course is provided on Itslearning -platform. All learning and assignments will be done through this platform. Participating students will work in small teams and / of alone. This method of learning in teams has great benefits for the students for it allows the students to learn from one another and thus develop a new perspective.
The grading system ranges from 1 - 5 where;
1 = Mediocre; 2 = Satisfactory; 3 = Good; 4 = Very good; 5 = Excellent
Assessment based on successful completion of course assignments and self-reflection.
All assignments are compulsory in order to pass the course. Peer review is considered very important.
English
01.01.2022 - 31.07.2022
02.12.2021 - 29.03.2022
10 - 40
NOTE: Course is only for PINBOS students.
Liiketalous (not translated)
Degree Programme in International Business (not translated)
Location-independent
2 credits
5 credits
H-5
No optional methods.
No exam. The course is done through assignments.
Innovation pedagogy, PBL.
The scope of the course is 5 credits (=135 h). The course will be completed through assignments given at Itslearning platform.
This is an online course.
The student show very limited knowledge and understanding of the main areas of the course as well as inability to grasp fundamental business law theories and inability to apply the theories to the case studies/assignments. Zero or insignificant contribution in completion of team assignments. Student show very little ability to gather and interpret relevant legal issues to come to informed judgments that include reflection about what is asked for the assignments. The student has difficulties in communicating his/her ideas to others. Several parts of the text are unclear. Or deadlines are missed.
The student demonstrates limited knowledge and understanding of the main areas of the course. The student shows difficulties in applying his/her knowledge and understanding of the content. Basic understanding of business law theories, and limited ability and apply knowledge into the case studies/assignments. The student has difficulties in communicating his/her ideas to others. Some parts of the text are unclear or limited. References used poorly. Peer review "limited".
Good understanding of key legal issues, and able to interpret cases and apply the theoretical knowledge into the case studies/assignments. The student demonstrates good ability to gather and interpret relevant legal information to inform judgments that include reflection about what is asked for the assignments. The student is able to communicate his/her ideas to others. Important parts of the text are clear and well written, references used well and extensively. Positive peer review comments.
Excellent understanding of in depth legal issues and interpretations, and able to demonstrate, apply theoretical knowledge into practice. The student ability to gather and interpret relevant cases is consistent throughout the course duration. The student is able to communicate clearly his/her ideas to others in a professional way. Most of the text is clear and well written, lots of good references used. Peer review excellent.
Mikko Niskanen
Anniina Kolari
Nicolas Le Grand
Ajaya Joshi
Nicolas Le Grand, Ajaya Joshi: course leaders
Mikko Niskanen: coach
Anniina Kolari: coach
Distance learning
Course book:
Principles of Marketing, Global edition (2021). Kotler P., Amstrong G., 18th edition. Pearson Education. Available as an eBook on FINNA via the VLebooks database.
Collection of articles and video clips
Online implementation
Fail (0pts), Good (1pts) and Excellent (2pts)
1 Individual assignments: 2 points maximum
3 study team discussions: 6 points maximum
4 team assignments: 8 points maximum
The students can get a maximum of altogether 16 points.
The points translate as follow for the final grade:
16-14 points: 5
13-12 points: 4
11-10 points: 3
9-8 points: 2
7 points:1
6 and below: 0
Please note that missing a deadline equals 0 points (unless medical certificate)
English
23.08.2021 - 15.12.2021
02.07.2021 - 12.09.2021
15 - 45
Liiketalous (not translated)
Degree Programme in International Business (not translated)
Location-independent
10 credits
H-5
To be discussed with the course leaders
This course is based on completion of assignments and therefore there is no exam.
Independent studies, flipped learning, case study analysis, online live team discussions, and project based learning.
30 hours: preparing and attending study team meetings and all group meetings
180 hours: studying course materials
50 hours: Study team assignments
20 hours:individual assignments
50 hours: study team discussions
Defining Marketing and the Marketing process
Analyzing the Marketing Environment
Managing Marketing information to gain customer insights
Consumer Markets and Buyer Behavior
Products, Services and Brands. Building Customer Value
Pricing: understanding and capturing customer value
Marketing Channels and Supply Chain Management
The student has demonstrated very limited knowledge and understanding of the main areas of the course. The student shows difficulties in applying his/her knowledge and understanding of the course content. The student demonstrates very little ability to gather and interpret relevant data to inform judgments that include reflection about what is asked for the assignments. The student has difficulties in communicating his/her ideas to others. Several parts of the text are unclear.
The student has demonstrated limited knowledge and understanding of the main areas of the course. The student shows some difficulties in applying his/her knowledge and understanding of the course content. The student demonstrates little ability to gather and interpret relevant data to inform judgments that include reflection about what is asked for the assignments. The student has difficulties in communicating his/her ideas to others. Some parts of the text are unclear
The student has demonstrated good knowledge and understanding of the main areas of the course. The student shows s/he can apply his/her knowledge and understanding of the course content. The student demonstrates good ability to gather and interpret relevant data to inform judgments that include reflection about what is asked for the assignments. The student is able to communicate his/her ideas to others. Important parts of the text are clear and well written.
The student has demonstrated very good knowledge and understanding of the main areas of the course. The student shows s/he can apply his/her knowledge and understanding of the course content. The student demonstrates very good ability to gather and interpret relevant data to inform judgments that include reflection about what is asked for the assignments. The student is able to communicate clearly his/her ideas to others in a professional way. Most of the text is clear and well written.
Maria Välivirta Havia
Timo Luukka
Distance learning
Value proposition design: how to create products and services customers want: get started with. Osterwalder et al. 2014. (e-book at FINNA)
Alexander Osterwalder, Yves Pigneur & Tim Clark: Business model generation: a handbook for visionaries, game changers and challengers. Available in the school library, also as an eBook.
Further study material (teachers' materials, additional articles and material links) will be provided in Optima during the course.
Individual work: User based innovation, solution creation
Group assignments: Products and market analysis, product specification, product development, go-to-market planning, solution selling, presentation
Items evaluated:
1) Individual pre-assignment 1 fail/ 1-5 (breadth and quality of content, facts supporting findings, quality of report) 30% of grade
Individual pre-assignment 2 fail / pass breadth and quality of content, quality of report
2) Final team report - fail/ 1-5 written and oral (background research, breadth and quality of content, facts supporting findings, quality of report)(content, breadth, sources used, documentation of feedback received and action taken based on feedback) 70% of grade
3) Peer evaluations (content, breadth, proposals for the team receiving feedback)
Not participating in AGM's is reflected in the students grade. If the student is not present in any AGMs the students course will be evaluated as "fail".
English
31.08.2021 - 30.12.2021
01.06.2021 - 14.10.2021
Information provided by the teachers on request.
Engineering and Business
Degree Programme in International Business (not translated)
Location-independent
5 credits
H-5
No alternative ways to pass the course available.
If you want to try AHOT, please contact one week prior to the course start.
No exams on this course.
Innovation pedagogy, teamlearning, digilearning
Fact finding, analysis and decision-making, evaluation, reporting and presentation.
IMPORTANT - PRE-ASSIGNMENTS DUE TO BE RETURNED BY OCTOBER 3.
Please read the instructions for the pre-assignments in ItsLearning and return your reports by 03.10.2021.
This course contains topics like product innovation, productization and go-to-market processes. After the course student is able to understand main principles of productitazion and its processes. Student has knowledge of customer based thinking and how it can be utilized to productization. Critical thinking and fact based evaluation are important skills developed in the course.
Course tasks includes individual pre-assignment and a group assignment in small teams.
Timing of the course:
01.09. - 01.10. Individual pre-assignment, innovation
07.10 - 28.10. Team assignment, Productization process
28.10. - 18.11. Team assignment, Product development and productization
18.11. - 28.11. Team assignment, Go-to-market process, sell the solution
Returned assignments do not meet requirements.
Individual assignments: Reports do present results but they lack factual foundation, they are superficial and not well argued for.
Reports do include results which are well presented, are based on facts and are well argued for. Reports include some analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the work done. Work is based on the theoretical content and models presented in the course. Team is able to implement teachers' feedback and make improvements in final report.
Reports are of high quality grammatically and content wise. Content contains in-depth analysis, fact based argumentation and adequate critique of the results presented. Results have a direct link to the theoretical content and models presented in the course. The final report reflects discussions and improvement ideas given during the course..
Poppy Skarli
Ajaya Joshi
95% Face-to-face, 5% Distance learning
English
03.01.2022 - 31.12.2022
27.08.2021 - 02.01.2022
Liiketalous (not translated)
Degree Programme in International Business (not translated)
Location-independent
1 credits
H-5
Nicolas Le Grand
Nicolas Le Grand: course leader
Distance learning
Saunders M. et al. 2019. Research Methods for Business Students. 8th Edition. Prentice Hall (availabe as an ebook on FINNA, Vlebook portal
Thesis from former and current IB students
Lectures, self-studies, workshops, thesis seminars, and commentaries
- 2 Assignments: pass/failed
- Research Proposal: pass/failed
- Attendance to thesis seminars
English
29.08.2021 - 21.12.2021
01.06.2021 - 06.09.2021
15 - 40
After your thesis proposal is accepted, you will be assigned a thesis supervisor. One important objective of this course is to get you started with your thesis.
Liiketalous (not translated)
Degree Programme in International Business (not translated)
Location-independent
5 credits
Hyväksytty/Hylätty
To be discussed with the responsible teacher
Learning by doing, flip learning and case study approach.
Attending lectures and thesis seminar: 10 hours
Research Proposal: 40 hours
Individual Assignments and self-studies: 60 hours
Commentaries and assessment of thesis: 30 hours
Research process and thesis writing process
Defining thesis objective, research questions and research scope
Identifying and using reliable and relevant past research (a literature review)
Research methodologies
Quantitative and qualitative data collection methods
Analyzing qualitative and quantitative data
Writing your research proposal
The main component to pass is the Research proposal. The other components (individual assignments...) are there to help you to write of a better research proposal and have a clear understanding of what the thesis writing process and requirements are at TUAS.
Anne Leinovaara-Matomäki
Lecturer: Anne Leinovaara-Matomäki
Distance learning
Informed at Optima platform.
Innovation pedagogy, PBL.
Only those tasks that are returned on time, before the final deadline, are evaluated and can be accepted ! Late returns are not qualified. Please note that Urkund- Plagiarism detection can be used, so use citations and references correctly (according to any standard you wish e.g. Harward, TUAS etc.)
Scale : 0- 5
• Fail (0)
There are clear mistakes in the returned tasks, or something is missing (e.g. video-presentation, peer comments etc.) or the tasks returned are very limited. Or the deadlines are neglected.
• Satisfactory (1-2)
All the task are returned on time and they reach satisfactory level, but they are limited / narrow and lacking deep analysis. Or the references are very limited.
• Good (3-4)
All the tasks are analytical, and well done. They represent high quality in terms of references, length, deep analysis. And in comparison to other group members there are clear bonus aspects (wider theories, more theories or tools used or so...). Also presentations are high quality. And the peer comments are constructive and analytical. There are lots of good references used and theories and tools relevant to the subject are shown in the assignments.
• Excellent (5)
All the tasks are excellent. And results are even higher than in the grade 3-4. Presentations extremely high quality as well as constructive peer comments.Theories, tools and references are widely used.
English
01.09.2021 - 31.12.2021
01.06.2021 - 06.09.2021
10 - 40
- Meetings at TEAMS - environment, invitations will be send to those enrolled and accepted to the course at Peppi.
Liiketalous (not translated)
Degree Programme in International Business (not translated)
Location-independent
2 credits
5 credits
H-5
No optional version.
If you want to AHOT the course and the process ( e.g. Recognition of prior learning), you have to demonstrate knowledge in the "key focus elements" (look at optima space and "welcome section") - and distribute a learning diary (length and guidelines same as in the course) about those themes. But no need to participate to the reading circuit + videos etc. This AHOT must be done before the first all group meeting if you want to use this option.
No exam, course is done through learning assignments.
Innovation pedagogy.
5 ects, detailed guidelines during the first all group session. 135 hours of student work.
Divided into the individual study, reading and reflection,( Learning Diary),
+ team discussions and sharing (Reading circuit)
Interactive online meetings , videos, reading materials and slides
Acording to separate timetable (on-line), for group PINBOS19 only. Autumn 2021.
Only those tasks that are returned on time, before the final deadline, are evaluated and can be accepted ! Late returns are not qualified. Please note that Urkund- Plagiarism detection can be used, so use citations and references correctly (according to any standard you wish e.g. Harvard, TUAS etc.). The reference books must be used when doing the assignments!
Scale : 0- 5
• Fail (0)
There are clear mistakes in the returned tasks, or something is missing (e.g. video-presentation, using references, peer comments etc.) or the tasks returned are very limited. Or the deadlines are neglected.
Only those tasks that are returned on time, before the final deadline, are evaluated and can be accepted ! Late returns are not qualified. Please note that Urkund- Plagiarism detection can be used, so use citations and references correctly (according to any standard you wish e.g. Harvard, TUAS etc.)
Scale : 0- 5
• Satisfactory (1-2)
All the task are returned on time and they reach satisfactory level, but they are limited / narrow and lacking deep analysis. Or the references are very limited.
Only those tasks that are returned on time, before the final deadline, are evaluated and can be accepted ! Late returns are not qualified. Please note that Urkund- Plagiarism detection can be used, so use citations and references correctly (according to any standard you wish e.g. Harvard, TUAS etc.)
Scale : 0- 5
• Good (3-4)
All the tasks are analytical, and well done. They represent high quality in terms of references, length, deep analysis. And in comparison to other group members there are clear bonus aspects (wider theories, more theories or tools used or so...). Also presentations are high quality. And the peer comments are constructive and analytical
Only those tasks that are returned on time, before the final deadline, are evaluated and can be accepted ! Late returns are not qualified. Please note that Urkund- Plagiarism detection can be used, so use citations and references correctly (according to any standard you wish e.g. Harvard, TUAS etc.)
Scale : 0- 5
• Excellent (5)
All the tasks are excellent. And results are even higher than in the grade 3-4. Presentations extremely high quality as well as constructive peer comments.Theories, tools and references are widely used.
Anne Leinovaara-Matomäki
Lecturer: Anne Leinovaara-Matomäki
Distance learning
Informed at the platform.
Innovation pedagogy, PBL.
Only those tasks that are returned on time, before the final deadline, are evaluated and can be accepted ! Late returns are not qualified. Please note that Urkund- Plagiarism detection can be used, so use citations and references correctly (according to any standard you wish e.g. Harward, TUAS etc.)
Scale : 0- 5
• Fail (0)
There are clear mistakes in the returned tasks, or something is missing (e.g. video-presentation, peer comments etc.) or the tasks returned are very limited. Or the deadlines are neglected.
• Satisfactory (1-2)
All the task are returned on time and they reach satisfactory level, but they are limited / narrow and lacking deep analysis. Or the references are very limited. Self- and peer evaluation (if asked) limited.
• Good (3-4)
All the tasks are analytical, and well done. They represent high quality in terms of references, length, deep analysis. And in comparison to other group members there are clear bonus aspects (wider theories, more theories or tools used or so...). Also presentations are high quality. And the peer comments are constructive and analytical. There are lots of good references used and theories and tools relevant to the subject are shown in the assignments. Self- and peer evaluation (if asked) analytical.
• Excellent (5)
All the tasks are excellent. And results are even higher than in the grade 3-4. Presentations extremely high quality as well as constructive peer comments.Theories, tools and references are widely used. Self- and peer evaluation analytical, reflective, vide and constructive.
English
01.08.2021 - 26.12.2021
02.07.2021 - 30.09.2021
5 - 40
-
Engineering and Business
Degree Programme in International Business (not translated)
Kupittaa Campus
2 credits
5 credits
H-5
No optional version.
No exam, course is done through learning assignments.
Innovation pedagogy.
5 ects, detailed guidelines at the database. 135 hours of student work.
Divided into the individual study, reading and reflection,
+ team discussions and sharing.
Online, videos, reading materials and slides.
According to separate timetable (on-line). Autumn course.
Only those tasks that are returned on time, before the final deadline, are evaluated and can be accepted ! Late returns are not qualified. Please note that Urkund- Plagiarism detection can be used, so use citations and references correctly (according to any standard you wish e.g. Harvard, TUAS etc.). The reference books must be used when doing the assignments!
Scale : 0- 5
• Fail (0)
There are clear mistakes in the returned tasks, or something is missing (e.g. video-presentation, using references, peer comments etc.) or the tasks returned are very limited. Or the deadlines are neglected.
Only those tasks that are returned on time, before the final deadline, are evaluated and can be accepted ! Late returns are not qualified. Please note that Urkund- Plagiarism detection can be used, so use citations and references correctly (according to any standard you wish e.g. Harvard, TUAS etc.)
Scale : 0- 5
• Satisfactory (1-2)
All the task are returned on time and they reach satisfactory level, but they are limited / narrow and lacking deep analysis. Or the references are very limited.
Only those tasks that are returned on time, before the final deadline, are evaluated and can be accepted ! Late returns are not qualified. Please note that Urkund- Plagiarism detection can be used, so use citations and references correctly (according to any standard you wish e.g. Harvard, TUAS etc.)
Scale : 0- 5
• Good (3-4)
All the tasks are analytical, and well done. They represent high quality in terms of references, length, deep analysis. And in comparison to other group members there are clear bonus aspects (wider theories, more theories or tools used or so...). Also presentations are high quality. And the self and peer comments are constructive and analytical.
Only those tasks that are returned on time, before the final deadline, are evaluated and can be accepted ! Late returns are not qualified. Please note that Urkund- Plagiarism detection can be used, so use citations and references correctly (according to any standard you wish e.g. Harvard, TUAS etc.)
Scale : 0- 5
• Excellent (5)
All the tasks are excellent. And results are even higher than in the grade 3-4. Presentations extremely high quality as well as constructive peer comments and self-evaluation.Theories, tools and references are widely used.
Pia Lindgren
Pirjo Kavander-Agge
Pirjo Kavander-Agge
Pia Lindgren (not translated)
Distance learning
Läromaterial finns på itslearning men alla möjliga andra studiematerial rekommenderas/kan utnyttjas. (not translated)
Kursen baserar sig på aktivt självständigt arbete och grupparbete. Alla gruppmöten ska bandas. Läraren är med i två möten för hela gruppen samt två möten för studiegrupper (not translated)
Indivduella online studier samt grupparbete. Läraren med i 4 online möten.
Ständig själv, kamrat och lärarutvärdering ska användas
Feedback på alla uppgifter
portfolio av minst 10 olika affärsdokument som evalueras, andra uppgifter finns för övning (not translated)
14.01.2022 - 31.03.2022
02.12.2021 - 16.01.2022
20 - 30
Liiketalous (not translated)
Degree Programme in International Business (not translated)
Location-independent
2 credits
H-5
Motsvarande kurser på andra högskolor. Alternative kurser måste diskuteras och godkännas av läraren. (not translated)
Kursen evalueras enligt uppgifter, inga tentamina (not translated)
Enligt Innopeda: arbetslivets situationer, teamarbete, diskussion
Indivuduella online studier samt grupparbete. Läraren med i 4 online möten.
Själv, kamrat och lärarutvärdering
Feedback på alla uppgifter (not translated)
Kursen ger 5 studiepöänger motsvarar c 133 h arbete
närindervisning (online) börjar den 20.1, förhandsuppgifte ges den 14.4
online möten med läraren 4 h,
självevaluering 2 h
repetition av strukturer och ordförråd c. 33 h
individuell förberedning till online möten/uppgifter c 95 h (not translated)
Svenska i arbetslivet ger sammanlagt 5 poänger men i två separarata vitsord: 2 för de muntliga och 3 för de skfriftliga kunskaper. Hela kursen beskrivs undan
Målet är att: studereranden klarar sig i olika muntliga och skrftliga affärslivssituationer. Han/hon kan söka och utnyttja ekonominyheter i media. Han/hon har en realistisk uppfattning om sin språknivå samt en positiv attityd för inlärning. Kursen kräver nivå B1.
Kursen baserar på att bygga ordförråd inom och öva kommunikation.
Kärnet ligger i:
Arbetsansökning och arbetstliv
Arbetsmiljö och omgivande samhälle
Kundkontakter: att bygga och hålla kontakter
Affärslivets terminologi
Kursen börjar med en förhandsuppgift den 14.1.22 och det första online möte för alla den 20.1.22 Den sista träffen är den 24.3.22 (not translated)
undankänd: Studeranden kan inte klara sig i varken skriftliga eller muntliga situationer på grund av knapp ordförråd, bristfälliga strukturer eller uttal. Kommunikationen är svårt eller omöjligt att förstå. Uppgifterna är inte returnerade. (not translated)
1-2 (B1-) Studeranden kan framföra sitt meddelande på svenska i arbetslivets enkla och allmänna situationer trots att enstaka fel gör kommunikationen långsamt och delvis störande. (not translated)
3-4 (B1) Studenrande kan reagera och uttrycka sig på ett lämpligt sätt i de flesta muntliga arbetslivssituationer. Han/hon kan visa intresse och ställa frågor. Uttalet är inte helt naturlig och det finns brister i strukturer och i ordförråd men studeranden visar motivation och fösöker sitt bästa. (not translated)
4-5 (B2+) Studeranden klarar sig utmärkt i mångsidiga arbetslivssituationer. Han/hon kan kommunicera i den stil som kontexten kräver och ta hänsyn till andra partiet. Kommunikationen är flytande och naturlig. (not translated)
Pia Lindgren
Pirjo Kavander-Agge
Pirjo Kavander-Agge
Pia LIndgren (not translated)
Distance learning
14.01.2022 - 31.03.2022
02.12.2021 - 16.01.2022
Liiketalous (not translated)
Degree Programme in International Business (not translated)
Location-independent
3 credits
H-5
Kursen förklaras i detalj i den muntliga delen (not translated)
Taneli Ahtiainen
Taneli Ahtiainen
Distance learning
Koch, J. & Karjalainen, O. (2016). Office 2016 & Office 365: Word, Excel, PowerPoint & Outlook. Jyväskylä: Docendo Oy.
Course e-book is available in Finna.
Individual work, Group work, flipped learning
English
20.08.2021 - 31.12.2021
23.08.2021 - 16.09.2021
0 - 50
Liiketalous (not translated)
Degree Programme in International Business (not translated)
Location-independent
5 credits
Hyväksytty/Hylätty
Students will get familiar uptodate office setting tools that will help them
-Attend and facilitate meetings
-give presentation, record and share instructions and information
-Write proper reports
-gather and interpret data
-read and search info current threats and data protection laws
August-December 21
Student will attend and contribute on groupwork and does knowledge questionaire
There is no implementations attached to this degree programme.