Design Thinking (5 cr)
Code: TE00BX15-3002
General information
- Enrollment
-
07.12.2021 - 28.01.2022
Registration for the implementation has ended.
- Timing
-
28.01.2022 - 27.05.2022
Implementation has ended.
- Number of ECTS credits allocated
- 5 cr
- Local portion
- 5 cr
- Mode of delivery
- Contact learning
- Unit
- Engineering and Business
- Campus
- Kupittaa Campus
- Teaching languages
- Finnish
- Seats
- 5 - 20
- Degree programmes
- Design Plugin - Diploma of Higher Education in Design
- Teachers
- Tarmo Karhu
- Teacher in charge
- Tarmo Karhu
- Groups
-
KMMMODDesignThinkingMOD Design Thinking
- Course
- TE00BX15
Evaluation scale
H-5
Content scheduling
Muotoiluajattelun teoreettinen pohja
- Johdannot
- Kirjallisen aineiston lukeminen ja reflektointi
Käytäntöön soveltaminen
- Harjoitukset
Objective
After the course student knows different definitions of design thinking and is able to apply design thinking viewpoint and some of the methods in different challenges and in multidisciplinary teams and different fields.
Content
Design thinking as a way of observing, seeing, and sensing the world.
Design thinking as methods of making sense of the complexity.
Design Thinking 5 ECTS course fits for anyone, who wishes to learn holistic human and experimental approach to be exploited in different challenges in different professional fields.
The course is structured in Introduction and in four main themes (A4DT - Approach Four Design Thinking):
1. Holistic View
2. Human View
3. Experimenting / prototyping
4. Concept Design
Each theme includes group tasks that are built on previous tasks.
Materials
Brown, T. 2019. Change by design: how design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation.
Miettinen, S. (toim.). 2014. Muotoiluajattelu.
Cross, N. 2011. Design Thinking
VanPatter, GK; Pastor, E. 2016. Innovation Methods Mapping, De-mystifying 80+ years of innovation process design.
VanPatter, GK; Pastor, E.; Jones, P. 2020 Rethinking Design Thinking: Making sense of the future that has already arrived.
Raami, A. 2020. Intuitio3: Yhteys mahdottomaan ratkaisuun.
Hyppönen, H. 2020. Luomiskertomus: Matkalla luovuuden tulevaisuuteen.
Miettinen, S. (toim.) 2021: Muotoilun avaimet älykkääseen teollisuuteen ja liiketoiminnan ketterään kehittämiseen.
Teaching methods
Yhteisoppiminen, itsenäinen opiskelu ja reflektointi
Student workload
Opiskelijan työhön sisältyy lähi- ja etäohjauskertojen lisäksi itsenäistä ohjattua opiskelua. Ohjaavana määrittelynä 1 op = 27h opiskelijan työtä.
Evaluation methods and criteria
Opintojakso arvioidaan asteikolla 0 - 5.
Arvosanaan vaikuttaa aktiivinen osallistuminen tehtävien suorittamiseen sekä ryhmätyöskentelyyn, tehtävien suorittaminen sekä sovitun aikataulun noudattaminen.
Arvioinnin perusteina (yksilöharjoitustyöt ja raportit, ryhmäharjoitustyöt):
- Tiedonhankinnan kattavuus ja hyödyntäminen työskentelyssä
- Reflektointi, näkökulmien ymmärtäminen ja kokonaisuuksien hahmottaminen
- Ideoiden ja vaihtoehtojen monipuolisuus
- Tehtävien palauttaminen sovitussa aikataulussa
Itse-/vertaisarviointi vaikuttaa arvosanan muodostumiseen opettajan arvioinnin lisäksi.
Failed (0)
Quantity: the work is not completed and or,
Quality: the minimum content requirements are not met.
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Sufficient 1
Theory and methodology are poorly understood. The implementation in assignments are poor.
Research, communication and documentation are hardly acceptable.
Moderate participation.
Satisfactory 2
Appear to grasp theory and have made a start in showing its applicability in assignments.
Research, communication and documentation are acceptable.
Moderate participation.
Assessment criteria, good (3-4)
Good 3
Understanding of theory and applicability of methods in assignments, but work could be stronger.
Research, communication and documentation are good.
Active participation.
Very Good 4
General understanding of theory and methods, very good implementation in assignments.
Reliable research, innovative work and communication and documentation on good level.
Very active participation.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Excellent 5
Mastery of theory and methods, proficiency of implementation of them in assignments.
Outstanding research, innovative work and excellent communication and documentation.
Very active participation.