Siirry suoraan sisältöön

Risk Management (5 op)

Toteutuksen tunnus: MS00CM64-3001

Toteutuksen perustiedot


Ilmoittautumisaika

17.04.2023 - 17.09.2023

Ajoitus

01.09.2023 - 01.12.2023

Opintopistemäärä

5 op

Virtuaaliosuus

5 op

Toteutustapa

Etäopetus

Yksikkö

Tekniikka ja liiketoiminta

Toimipiste

Paikasta riippumaton

Opetuskielet

  • Englanti

Paikat

15 - 25

Koulutus

  • Ammattikorkeakoulun yhteiset vapaasti valittavat opinnot

Opettaja

  • Reetta Raitoharju
  • Tapani Kilpeläinen
  • Kaisa Sorsa
  • Heidi Salokangas

Ajoitusryhmät

  • Avoimen AMK:n kiintiöpaikat. Ilmoittaudu ilman tätä pienryhmää (Koko: 5. Avoin AMK: 5.)

Ryhmät

  • VAVY2324
    Ammattikorkeakoulun yhteiset vapaasti valittavat (YAMK)

Pienryhmät

  • Avoimen AMK:n kiintiöpaikat. Ilmoittaudu ilman tätä pienryhmää
  • 27.09.2023 08:15 - 11:45, Risk Management MS00CM64-3001
  • 11.10.2023 08:15 - 11:45, Risk Management MS00CM64-3001
  • 08.11.2023 08:15 - 11:45, Risk Management MS00CM64-3001
  • 29.11.2023 08:15 - 11:45, Risk Management MS00CM64-3001

Tavoitteet

After completing the course, the student is able to:
- describe the general risk management process
- identify, evaluate and analyze the risks in the context of quality management at his/her own field
- identify, evaluate and analyze product development risks and/or process risks
- identify, evaluate and analyze project risks
- manage legal risks
- select applicable risk management methods for his/her own field

Sisältö

- General risk management terms and definitions
- General risk management process
- Management of legal risks (e.g. corporate sustainability due diligence)
- Project risk evaluation and risk plans
- Applicable risk management standars (e.g. SFS-EN14971)
- Selection of risk evaluation tools and methods

Oppimateriaalit

Suggested article list in ItsLearning,
Industry Specific Risk Management Standards
and other materials provided by the lecturers.

Opetusmenetelmät

Course is 100% online and instruction language is English, but the final output (= report) can be done in Finnish. If all participants are Finnish-speaking, kick-off and discussions can also be held in Finnish.

Pre-assignments will be opened for you min 1 week before the meeting.
Mainly independent & self-directive learning
Collaborative asynchronous discussions with other students on discussion forums

Tenttien ajankohdat ja uusintamahdollisuudet

no exams

Pedagogiset toimintatavat ja kestävä kehitys

Innovation pedagogy, flipped learning

Opiskelijan ajankäyttö ja kuormitus

Total, average student work is about 133h. Webinars cover about 16h, all remaining in individual learning, assignment works including student group collaboration.

Introduction to the theme and terminology: pre-reading list + multiple choice test

Designing and implementing risk analysis framework and tools for your own business field or organisation (or other institution, brand etc.)

Reporting results and suggestions.

Self-evaluation of learning and individual learning diary.

Sisällön jaksotus

General risk management terms and definitions
- General risk management process
- Management of legal risks (e.g. corporate sustainability due diligence)
- Project risk evaluation and risk plans
- Applicable risk management standars (e.g. SFS-EN14971)
- Selection of risk evaluation tools and methods

Viestintäkanava ja lisätietoja

ItsLearning

Arviointiasteikko

H-5

Arviointimenetelmät ja arvioinnin perusteet

Grading of the course is done as follows:
Terminology multiple choice test 20 %
Participation for contact lessons 10 %
Group work report and presentation 30 %
Personal Learning Diary 40 %
Course can be approved when all the assignments are passed at least with the minimum grade.

Hylätty (0)

Quantity:
Assignments are not completed to an acceptable level.
Quality:
The minimum learning objectives are not met (see course description),
There is a lack of knowledge of academic conventions.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1-2)

Quantity:
Research, thinking, communication and reflection are acceptable
Quality:
Appear to grasp theory and have made a start in showing its applicability.
Knowledge of academic conventions is inadequate.

Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3-4)

Quantity:
Research, thinking, communication and reflection are good.
Quality:
General understanding of theory and application in real-life context
Knowledge of academic conventions is good, although there may be systematic minor errors.

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

Quantity:
Mastery of theory and penetrating insights in real-life context
Quality:
Outstanding research, thinking, communication and reflection
Knowledge of academic conventions is excellent.