Leadership (5 cr)
Code: 3041149-3009
General information
Enrollment
02.12.2023 - 28.01.2024
Timing
31.01.2024 - 28.03.2024
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual portion
4 op
Mode of delivery
20 % Contact teaching, 80 % Distance learning
Unit
Engineering and Business
Campus
Lemminkäisenkatu
Teaching languages
- English
Seats
10 - 30
Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Business
Teachers
- Nicolas Le Grand
Groups
-
MLIITS21
-
MLIISK23
-
MLIITS23Liiketalouden monimuotokoulutus, syksy 2023
-
MLIITS22Liiketalouden monimuotokoulutus, syksy 2022
-
MLIISK22
- 07.02.2024 09:00 - 12:00, Leadership 3041149-3009
- 06.03.2024 09:00 - 12:00, Leadership 3041149-3009
Objective
After completing the course the student:
- knows and understands key leadership principles and practices;
- recognizes how leaders can motivate their staff using intrinsic and extrinsic motivators
- recognizes the different ways a leader can, for example, set goals, reward and develop his/her staff
Content
- Key concepts in leadership
- Motivation, satisfaction and performance
- Power, influence and leadership
- Delegation or the art of developing others
- Conflict resolution
- Leading change
- Leader toolbox
Teaching methods
Lectures, case studies, flipped learning
Exam schedules
This course is based on assignment and there is no exam.
International connections
The student study most of the concepts at home (short videos, reading materials, individual assignments and peer reviews), we work on concrete leadership cases/situations in class.
Completion alternatives
Selection of articles to be available in ITS Learning:
• Martine Haas, Mark Mortensen - Jun 2016 – The secrets of Great Teamwork
• Zak, Paul J. – Jan-Feb 2017- The Neuroscience of Trust
• Barbara Kellerman - 2007 - What every leader needs to know about followers
• Ronald J. Burke - 2006 - Why leaders fail: exploring the darkside
• D. Goleman - 2000 - Leadership That Gets Results
• Williams G. - 2002 - Change the way you persuade
• Stengel R. - 2008 - Mandela His 8 Lessons of Leadership
• Kotter P. (2007) - Leading Change Why Transformation Efforts Fail
• Herzberg,(2003), One more time, how do you motivate employees?
• McNulty E. (2002) - Welcome Aboard (But don't change a thing)
Student workload
Contact lessons: 6h
Studying reading materials ~ 30/50h
Working on assignments and peer reviews ~ 40-60h
Content scheduling
Key leadership concepts, motivating and rewarding (7.2)
Leadership toolbox: Briefing and debriefing, authority and sanctioning (6.3)
Further information
Attendance for the 2 contact lessons is compulsory in order to be able to pass the course.
Evaluation scale
H-5
Assessment methods and criteria
All the components (individual assignments, peer reviews…) of this course will be graded as follow:
Fail (0pts)
Pass / Good (1pts)
Really good / Excellent (2pts)
• 3 individual assignments: 6 points maximum
• 3 peers reviews: 6 points maximum
• 1 pair assignment: 4 points maximum
The points translate as follow for the final grade:
• 16-14 points = grade 5
• 13-12 points = grade 4
• 11-10 points = grade 3
• 9-8 points = grade 2
• 7 points = grade 1
• 6 points and below = fail
OBS: The two first individual assignments and the pair assignment are compulsory to be able to pass the course.
Assessment criteria, fail (0)
The student has demonstrated very limited knowledge and understanding of the main areas of the course. The student shows difficulties in applying his/her knowledge and understanding of the course content. The student demonstrates very little ability to gather and interpret relevant data to inform judgments that include reflection about what is asked for the assignments. The student has difficulties in communicating his/her ideas to others. Several parts of the text are unclear.
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
The student has demonstrated limited knowledge and understanding of the main areas of the course. The student shows some difficulties in applying his/her knowledge and understanding of the course content. The student demonstrates little ability to gather and interpret relevant data to inform judgments that include reflection about what is asked for the assignments. The student has difficulties in communicating his/her ideas to others. Some parts of the text are unclear.
Assessment criteria, good (3-4)
The student has demonstrated good knowledge and understanding of the main areas of the course. The student shows s/he can apply his/her knowledge and understanding of the course content. The student demonstrates good ability to gather and interpret relevant data to inform judgments that include reflection about what is asked for the assignments. The student is able to communicate his/her ideas to others. Important parts of the text are clear and well written.
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
The student has demonstrated very good knowledge and understanding of the main areas of the course. The student shows s/he can apply his/her knowledge and understanding of the course content. The student demonstrates very good ability to gather and interpret relevant data to inform judgments that include reflection about what is asked for the assignments. The student is able to communicate clearly his/her ideas to others in a professional way. Most of the text is clear and well written.