Opinto-opas

Tavoitteet

Opintojakson suoritettaan opiskelija osaa:
· etsiä ja hyödyntää tieteellisiä julkaisuja
· kuvata keskeisimmät tutkimus- ja kehittämismenetelmät sekä analyysimenetelmät
· valita ja käyttää oikein omaan työhön soveltuvia tutkimusmenetelmiä
· kriittisesti arvioida tutkimuksen tuloksia
· raportoida kehittämishankkeesta tarkoituksenmukaisesti
· ymmärtää tutkimustiedon merkityksen

Sisältö

Sisällön painotus voi vaihdella toteutuksen ja koulutusalan mukaan:
· tiedon haku ja tieteellisen lähdeaineiston käyttö
· tutkimussuunnitelman laatiminen
· tutkimuksen etiikka
· tutkimusmenetelmät, kvalitatiivinen ja kvantitatiivinen tutkimus
· tietojen analysointi
· tutkimuksen esittäminen ja raportointi

Oppimateriaalit

Academic Conventions:

Different writing-related online resources as an example: Academic Phrases for Writing Results & Discussion Sections of a Research Paper. (n.d.). https://www.ref-n-write.com/blog/research-paper-example-writing-results-discussion-section-academic-phrasebank-vocabulary/ (retrieved on 21APR2021)

APA Style. (n.d.). Https://Apastyle.Apa.Org. Retrieved May 29, 2024, from https://apastyle.apa.org

Quantitative methods:

Burke, S.E., & Silvestrini, R.T. (2017). The Certified Quality Engineer Handbook. ASQ Quality Press. Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Herzog, M.H., Francis, G., & Clarke, A. (2019). Understanding Statistics and Experimental Design - How to Not Lie with Statistics. Springer Open. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03499-3
Kronthaler, F., & Zöllner, S. (2021). Data Analysis with RStudio - An Easy going Introduction. Springer Spectrum and R Studio. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-62518-7


Scientific articles

Qualitative research methods:
Auerbach, C., & Silverstein, L.B. (2003). Qualitative Data: An Introduction to Coding and Analysis. New York University Press.
Dey, I. (2005). Qualitative Data Analysis: a user-friendly guide for social scientists. Taylor & Francis.
Eriksson, P., & Kovalainen, A. (2008). Qualitative Methods in Business Research. SAGE Publications.
Klenke, K., Martin, S., & Wallace, J.R. (2016). Qualitative Research in the Study of Leadership. (Second Edition). Emerald.

And other materials provided on itsLearning.

Opetusmenetelmät

- Individual and team work
- Exercises
- Self- and peer-assessments
- Discussions
- Presentations

Tenttien ajankohdat ja uusintamahdollisuudet

None.

Pedagogiset toimintatavat ja kestävä kehitys

Study Groups, Project-based learning
Individual and group assignments

When considering the thesis topic and the content of it, sustainability issues are reminded

Toteutuksen valinnaiset suoritustavat

If necessary, this can be arranged during the IPS discussion or by agreement with the course teacher.

Opiskelijan ajankäyttö ja kuormitus

Face-to-face lectures (16 h)

Individual learning task: video lectures for qualitative, and quantitative research and development methods and online tests related to lectures on Itslearning 36 h

Task-related to your thesis plan 56 h:
- Individual learning task: reading task
-Individual learning task: preliminary assignments for each class (related to your research topic)
-Individual learning task: homework assignments after each class (related to your research topic)
- Individual learning task: research plan and presentation of the research (related to your research topic)
- Individual learning task: opposing and opposing reports of fellow students


Group project task: Delphi study: 27 h

Total 135 h

The workload indicates the average workload required to achieve the course's learning objectives and the grade 3/5. Depending on the student's previous knowledge and experience, the workload may be less or more. The competence acquired in the course will be assessed through assignments and other deliverables, not through the number of hours worked.

Sisällön jaksotus

- Academic Conventions (APA7)

Quantitative methods:
- Empirical research, steps of quantitative research and research design
- Measurement, questionnaire
- Sampling, statistical description, observation matrix, frequency
- Variables of the variable,
- Graphical presentation
- Statistical inference
- Hypotheses
- Correlations between variables
- Testing of means
- Research framework, research tasks, research problems, research questions, research hypotheses
- Reporting the research findings
- Reporting the results of the study
- The evaluation part of the study in the report

Qualitative Research:
Content:
- different types of approaches and research principles
- qualitative research and analysis methods: interviews, benchmarking, questionnaires with open questions, workshops / brainstorming, content analysis with coding
- quality issues and ethics in the research, data management, IPR and GDPR
- literature search, evaluation and use of the appropriate research methods for projects and master's thesis

Master's Thesis research plan (academic conventions) and opposing - presentations

12.9.2024 9-11 Quantitative and qualitative methods/ Salokangas, Seppälä-Kavén
19.9.2024 9-11 Quantitative and qualitative methods/ Salokangas, Seppälä-Kavén
10.10.2024 9-11 Quantitative and qualitative methods/ Salokangas, Seppälä-Kavén
31.10.2024 9-11 Quantitative and qualitative methods/ Salokangas, Seppälä-Kavén
14.11.2024 9-11 Quantitative and qualitative methods/ Salokangas, Seppälä-Kavén
28.11.2024 9-11 Quantitative and qualitative methods/ Salokangas, Seppälä-Kavén
5.12.2024 9-12 Presentations of thesis research plan Salokangas, Seppälä-Kavén
13.12.2024 13-16 Presentations of thesis research plan Salokangas, Seppälä-Kavén

Viestintäkanava ja lisätietoja

ItsLearning
heidi.salokangas@turkuamk.fi

Arviointiasteikko

H-5

Arviointimenetelmät ja arvioinnin perusteet

Video lecture tests (passed/failed)
Preliminary and home assignments (passed/failed)
Delfoi-group study (passed/failed)
Opposing and opposing report (1-5)
Own research plan (1-5)

In addition to the knowledge base, the assessment of reporting will focus on the knowledge of academic conventions (such as writing style and tone, text structure, correct citation technique including in-text citations and bibliography), and depth of coverage.

Returning assignments after the deadline (late) may negatively impact the grade of the assignment.

Hylätty (0)

Assignments are not completed to an acceptable level and or not returned assignments - instructions have not been followed

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1-2)

Communication and reflection are acceptable - assignments are partly done according to the instructions.

Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3-4)

Communication and reflection are good - assignments are done according to the instructions.

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

Outstanding communication, reflection and application - assignments are done according to the instructions and returned on time -by the deadline.