English Professional Skills, B2 (3op)

Arviointiasteikko

H-5

Sisällön jaksotus

Contents
- writing professional, field-specific texts
- presenting and discussing field-specific topics in a professional manner
- reading field-specific texts and utilizing the information in professional contexts
- learning and using key terminology of their field
- becoming professional, autonomous language users in working life

Tavoitteet

The aim of the course is to activate and develop the students’ field-relevant English language and communication skills. The students gain professional skills in various spoken and written communicative situations encountered in working life and society. In addition, they learn to utilize tools and techniques to further develop their skills in authentic, field-specific contexts.
Upon completing the course, the students have acquired sufficient skills to communicate at level B2 of the European Framework of Reference for Languages which states that at level B2, students should be able to produce clear, coherent and well-structured texts, present detailed descriptions related to their field of interest, express and exchange opinions using fluent language, follow complex argumentation, and read longer articles and reports.

Sisältö

- writing professional, field-specific texts
- presenting and discussing field-specific topics in a professional manner
- reading field-specific texts and utilizing the information in professional contexts
- learning and using key terminology of the field
- becoming professional, autonomous language users in working life

Oppimateriaalit

Provided by the teacher

Opetusmenetelmät

Self-study, learning by doing, completing distance tasks, teamwork

Tenttien ajankohdat ja uusintamahdollisuudet

No exam as the course is task-based and assessed based on successful completion of required assignments and active participation in weekly lessons.

Pedagogiset toimintatavat ja kestävä kehitys

Flipped learning, work life oriented, task-based learning assignments, independent and small group study

Toteutuksen valinnaiset suoritustavat

- Similar English courses in other HEI's
- Accreditation of prior learning is possible, please contact the teacher for instructions before the course starts.

Opiskelijan ajankäyttö ja kuormitus

- Online teaching and students' individual and teamwork. The course is a 3 cr course, which is equivalent to 80 hours of student work.
- Online lessons
- Written and oral distance tasks. Tasks that are completed in teams during the lessons.

Arviointimenetelmät ja arvioinnin perusteet

- The assessment is based on distance tasks and activity in the Teams sessions (100% presence).
- All the distance tasks have to be returned by the deadline. Returning them late can affect the assessment.
- Use of AI forbidden in the distance tasks to be returned.

NB:
- Absences cannot be compensated with extra work.
- If the student passes the course, it is not possible to raise the grade by redoing some of the assignments (as stated in the degree regulation).

Hylätty (0)

- The student does not meet the criteria for grade 1.
- Assignments not returned according to the instructions
- Too many absences from lessons

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1-2)

1
Written skills:
Not fluent in structure
No sense of formal and informal style
Very frequent grammar and spelling mistakes
Very basic vocabulary. Needs more descriptive words.

Oral skills:
Not fluent in structure
No sense of formal and informal style. Very simple sentences
Many grammar mistakes
Simple vocabulary and phrases

2
Written skills:
Some fluency but writing is sometimes unclear.
Some sense of style but inconsistent at times. Appropriate genre needs attention.
Frequent grammatical and/or spelling errors, sentence structures confusing at times
Vocabulary is constant but details lack colour.

Oral skills:
Phrases connected in a simple, yet somewhat logical way helping to create some fluency
Some sense of style but inconsistent at times. Appropriate genre needs attention.
Frequent grammatical errors, sentence structures confusing at times
Vocabulary is limited, details lack color. Quite many pronunciation mistakes

Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3-4)

3
Written skills:
Quite fluent but in parts jumpy
Good sense of style, though at times inconsistent and mixed. Needs more metatextual elements/coherence
Some grammatical and/or spelling errors. Sentence structures clear.
Vocabulary is varied but supporting details need work. Word choices need more attention

Oral skills:
Clear, detailed and descriptive phrases. Quite fluent but in parts jumpy
Word choices need more attention Good sense of style, though at times inconsistent and mixed.
Some grammatical errors. Sentence structures clear.
Field specific vocabulary, pronunciation mistakes don’t restrict communication.

4
Written skills:
Good fluency using appropriate structure and stages of the writing genre.
Good sense of style but tendency to slip into very informal style. Good use of cohesive and metatextual elements.
More than a couple of spelling or other small mistakes and a few errors in grammar.
Vocabulary is varied and supporting details good though some unfinished details.

Oral skills:
Clear, detailed descriptions of specific subjects. Good fluency using appropriate structure
Good sense of style but tendency to slip into very informal style.
Good command of grammar, very few errors in grammar.
Good command of pronunciation and varied vocabulary

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

Written skills:
Excellent fluency, clear evidence of cohesion.
Evidence of competence in formal and informal style and an ability to adapt English for professional purposes.
Very few errors in grammar and spelling.
Vocabulary is excellent. Ideas are presented articulately. Evidence of wide lexis.

Oral skills:
Clear, smoothly-flowing fluency in a style appropriate to the context. Logical structure which helps the recipient to notice and remember significant points.
Evidence of competence in formal and informal style and an ability to adapt English for professional purposes.
Excellent command of grammar
Vocabulary is excellent and ideas are presented articulately. Excellent command of pronunciation.

Lisätiedot

Teams, Itslearning, email