International Business Operations Management (5 op)

Arviointiasteikko

H-5

Sisällön jaksotus

Lukujärjestyksen mukaisesti. Ilmoittautuminen Pepissä. Tarkemmat ohjeet optimassa. Optima kansion ohjeistus on välttämätöntä lukea huolella ja ensimmäisellä luentokerralla on välttämätön pakollinen läsnäolo, jotta kurssin suoritustapa ja -vaatimukset tulevat selväksi. Poissalo ensimmäiseltä luentokerralta aiheuttaa kurssisuorituksen automaattisen siirtymisen seuraavaan suorituskertaan.
Kurssin suoritettuaan opiskelija osaa:
- kehittää ymmärrystään kansainvälisen bsuineksen sisällöstä ja merkityksestä
- ymmärtää suunnittelun , toimeenpanon ja arvioinnin merkityksen liittyen kansainväliseen liiketoimintaan

Tavoitteet

The overall aim of the study unit is to increase the students' awareness of the content and significance of international business. The students learn to understand the concept of planning, implementation and evaluation of international operations.

Sisältö

- The significance of internationalisation
- The international environment
- Gathering international market information
- The strategic planning of international operations
- Alternatives for internationalisation
- Export planning
- Implementation and evaluation of international business

Oppimateriaalit

Radebaugh et al.: International Business
Hill & O'Sullivan: Foundation Marketing

Opetusmenetelmät

Innovaatiopedagogiikka, PBL.

Tenttien ajankohdat ja uusintamahdollisuudet

Ei tenttiä, kurssi suoritetaan harjoitustöiden avulla. Tarkemmat ohjeet ensimmäisellä luentokerralla, jolla välttämätön pakollinen läsnäolo. Kaikki harjoitustehtävät tulee olla hyväksyttävästi suoritettu.

Pedagogiset toimintatavat ja kestävä kehitys

Innovaatiopedagogiikka, PBL.

Toteutuksen valinnaiset suoritustavat

Ei valinnaisia suoritustapoja.

Opiskelijan ajankäyttö ja kuormitus

5 op,. Ohejistetaan tarkemmin ensimmäisellä luentokerralla. Ilmoittautuminen Pepissä. Tarkemmat ohjeet optimassa. Optima kansion ohjeistus on välttämätöntä lukea huolella ja ensimmäisellä luentokerralla on välttämätön pakollinen läsnäolo, jotta kurssin suoritustapa ja -vaatimukset tulevat selväksi. Poissalo ensimmäiseltä luentokerralta aiheuttaa kurssisuorituksen automaattisen siirtymisen seuraavaan suorituskertaan.
Huomaa, että kun kurssissa ei ole tenttiä, ainut tapa korottaa arvosanaa, on osallistua seuraavaan kurssitoteutukseen, joten kannattaa panostaa harjoitustehtäviin huolella alusta alkaen.

Arviointimenetelmät ja arvioinnin perusteet

On a scale: 0 - 5

Hylätty (0)

Failed
Look above +
Quantity: The work is not completed on deadline (all the assignments!), and / or the page requirements are not fulfilled and or;
Quality: The minimum content requirements are not met, e.g. there are no reference books used, suitable theories or tools are not used, etc.

More detailed: On a scale: 0 - 5

The quality of the assignments e.g. case solutions is a key evaluation criteria, focusing on the final individual case, which is a corner stone of your final grade (group cases can either up-grade or down-grade the final grade). The quality of your solutions + presentations is the evaluation criteria for your final grade, so try to do as profound, versatile and good solutions as you can. Use books, theories, tools etc. and mark your references. The more you use theories and tools ( e.g. Marketing Mix, Boston matrix, Ansof matrix, SWOT, TOWS, PESTLE, Five Forces, Sig-Sigma etc., etc. ) the better. Make an in-dept study on which you base your solution.
Note: Only those tasks that are returned on time, before the deadlines, are evaluated and can be accepted, and all the cases and presentations must be done in order to be accepted !
Late returns are not qualified.
Please note also that Urkund- Plagiarism detection can be used, so use citations and references correctly (according to any standard you wish e.g. Harvard, TUAS etc.)

Assessement Scale: 0- 5
• Fail (0)
There are clear mistakes in the returned tasks, or something is missing or the tasks returned are very limited. Or the deadlines are neglected.
• Satisfactory (1-2)
All the task are returned on time and they reach satisfactory level, but they are limited / narrow and lacking deep analysis. The use of tools and theories is limited. Or the references are very limited. The page amount can be limited as well. Theories or tools are not used or are used in poor way.
• Good (3-4)
All the tasks are analytical and well done. They represent high quality in terms of references, length, deep analysis, solution possibilities and drawn conclusions. The theory and the reality (in companies) are reflected, lots of tools used. In comparison to other there are clear bonus aspects (wider theories, more theories or tools used or so...). Also presentations are of high quality. And the peer comments back-up the high quality participation in group works. There are lots of good references used and theories and tools relevant to the subject are shown in the assignments.
• Excellent (5)
All the tasks are excellent. Results are even higher than in the grade 3-4. Presentations extremely high quality.Theories, tools and references are widely used.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1-2)

Acceptable, BUT Below Average
Look above +
- Research, thinking, and communication are hardly acceptable, and / or the page amount is limited
- Appear to grasp theory and have made a start in showing its applicability
- Presentation is limited

More detailed:
On a scale: 0 - 5

The quality of the assignments e.g. case solutions is a key evaluation criteria, focusing on the final individual case, which is a corner stone of your final grade (group cases can either up-grade or down-grade the final grade). The quality of your solutions + presentations is the evaluation criteria for your final grade, so try to do as profound, versatile and good solutions as you can. Use books, theories, tools etc. and mark your references. The more you use theories and tools ( e.g. Marketing Mix, Boston matrix, Ansof matrix, SWOT, TOWS, PESTLE, Five Forces, Sig-Sigma etc., etc. ) the better. Make an in-dept study on which you base your solution.
Note: Only those tasks that are returned on time, before the deadlines, are evaluated and can be accepted, and all the cases and presentations must be done in order to be accepted !
Late returns are not qualified.
Please note also that Urkund- Plagiarism detection can be used, so use citations and references correctly (according to any standard you wish e.g. Harvard, TUAS etc.)

Assessement Scale: 0- 5
• Fail (0)
There are clear mistakes in the returned tasks, or something is missing or the tasks returned are very limited. Or the deadlines are neglected.
• Satisfactory (1-2)
All the task are returned on time and they reach satisfactory level, but they are limited / narrow and lacking deep analysis. The use of tools and theories is limited. Or the references are very limited. The page amount can be limited as well. Theories or tools are not used or are used in poor way.
• Good (3-4)
All the tasks are analytical and well done. They represent high quality in terms of references, length, deep analysis, solution possibilities and drawn conclusions. The theory and the reality (in companies) are reflected, lots of tools used. In comparison to other there are clear bonus aspects (wider theories, more theories or tools used or so...). Also presentations are of high quality. And the peer comments back-up the high quality participation in group works. There are lots of good references used and theories and tools relevant to the subject are shown in the assignments.
• Excellent (5)
All the tasks are excellent. Results are even higher than in the grade 3-4. Presentations extremely high quality.Theories, tools and references are widely used.

Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3-4)

Satisfactory/Very Good
Look above +
- Research, thinking, and communication are satisfactory and very good, reference books are used, tools and theories are used
- Understanding of theory and applicability but work could be stronger
- Demonstrate general understanding of theory and application in real life context
- Good presentation

More detailed: On a scale: 0 - 5

The quality of the assignments e.g. case solutions is a key evaluation criteria, focusing on the final individual case, which is a corner stone of your final grade (group cases can either up-grade or down-grade the final grade). The quality of your solutions + presentations is the evaluation criteria for your final grade, so try to do as profound, versatile and good solutions as you can. Use books, theories, tools etc. and mark your references. The more you use theories and tools ( e.g. Marketing Mix, Boston matrix, Ansof matrix, SWOT, TOWS, PESTLE, Five Forces, Sig-Sigma etc., etc. ) the better. Make an in-dept study on which you base your solution.
Note: Only those tasks that are returned on time, before the deadlines, are evaluated and can be accepted, and all the cases and presentations must be done in order to be accepted !
Late returns are not qualified.
Please note also that Urkund- Plagiarism detection can be used, so use citations and references correctly (according to any standard you wish e.g. Harvard, TUAS etc.)

Assessement Scale: 0- 5
• Fail (0)
There are clear mistakes in the returned tasks, or something is missing or the tasks returned are very limited. Or the deadlines are neglected.
• Satisfactory (1-2)
All the task are returned on time and they reach satisfactory level, but they are limited / narrow and lacking deep analysis. The use of tools and theories is limited. Or the references are very limited. The page amount can be limited as well. Theories or tools are not used or are used in poor way.
• Good (3-4)
All the tasks are analytical and well done. They represent high quality in terms of references, length, deep analysis, solution possibilities and drawn conclusions. The theory and the reality (in companies) are reflected, lots of tools used. In comparison to other there are clear bonus aspects (wider theories, more theories or tools used or so...). Also presentations are of high quality. And the peer comments back-up the high quality participation in group works. There are lots of good references used and theories and tools relevant to the subject are shown in the assignments.
• Excellent (5)
All the tasks are excellent. Results are even higher than in the grade 3-4. Presentations extremely high quality.Theories, tools and references are widely used.

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

Excellent:
Look above +
- Mastery of theory and penetrating insights in real-life context;
- Outstanding research, thinking, and communication, lots of good references used
- Excellent presentation
- In general overall results better than in good works.

More detailed: On a scale: 0 - 5

The quality of the assignments e.g. case solutions is a key evaluation criteria, focusing on the final individual case, which is a corner stone of your final grade (group cases can either up-grade or down-grade the final grade). The quality of your solutions + presentations is the evaluation criteria for your final grade, so try to do as profound, versatile and good solutions as you can. Use books, theories, tools etc. and mark your references. The more you use theories and tools ( e.g. Marketing Mix, Boston matrix, Ansof matrix, SWOT, TOWS, PESTLE, Five Forces, Sig-Sigma etc., etc. ) the better. Make an in-dept study on which you base your solution.
Note: Only those tasks that are returned on time, before the deadlines, are evaluated and can be accepted, and all the cases and presentations must be done in order to be accepted !
Late returns are not qualified.
Please note also that Urkund- Plagiarism detection can be used, so use citations and references correctly (according to any standard you wish e.g. Harvard, TUAS etc.)

Assessement Scale: 0- 5
• Fail (0)
There are clear mistakes in the returned tasks, or something is missing or the tasks returned are very limited. Or the deadlines are neglected.
• Satisfactory (1-2)
All the task are returned on time and they reach satisfactory level, but they are limited / narrow and lacking deep analysis. The use of tools and theories is limited. Or the references are very limited. The page amount can be limited as well. Theories or tools are not used or are used in poor way.
• Good (3-4)
All the tasks are analytical and well done. They represent high quality in terms of references, length, deep analysis, solution possibilities and drawn conclusions. The theory and the reality (in companies) are reflected, lots of tools used. In comparison to other there are clear bonus aspects (wider theories, more theories or tools used or so...). Also presentations are of high quality. And the peer comments back-up the high quality participation in group works. There are lots of good references used and theories and tools relevant to the subject are shown in the assignments.
• Excellent (5)
All the tasks are excellent. Results are even higher than in the grade 3-4. Presentations extremely high quality.Theories, tools and references are widely used.

Lisätiedot

-Ilmoittautuminen Pepissä. Tarkemmat ohjeet optimassa. Optima kansion ohjeistus on välttämätöntä lukea huolella ja ensimmäisellä luentokerralla on välttämätön pakollinen läsnäolo, jotta kurssin suoritustapa ja -vaatimukset tulevat selväksi. Poissalo ensimmäiseltä luentokerralta aiheuttaa kurssisuorituksen automaattisen siirtymisen seuraavaan suorituskertaan.