Study Guide

Objective

Objectives
Student is introduced to applying his/her knowledge in project work, leadership, research and development, financial administration and planning, as well as external entrepreneurship, in a practical working-life project.

Content

Content
Project planning, start-up, implementation and evaluation

Materials

Student guide is on the Itslearning workspace.
Students also need to read material addressing the themes of assignment.

Teaching methods

-project learning
-learning by doing
-learning in a team
-teachers coaching

International connections

Innovation padagogy
1. Students get an assignment from working life, related to development of services
2. Leaning takes places in teams, coached by a project manager and a teacher

Completion alternatives

-

Student workload

Altogether 135 hours:
-16 x 8 hours working days
- individual reporting and communication in the team 7 hours

Content scheduling

All Wednesdays are reserved for RDI practical training.

12.1.22 klo 9.15-11.30 Introduction
-klo 12.30-15.45 The training starts
19.1 klo 9.15-11.30 Training for project managers
26.1. Project groups work.
2.2. Project groups work.
9.2. Project groups work.
Return your project plan latest 11.2.22.
16.2. 10.00-11.30 Project managers and teachers meet.
2.3. Project groups work.
9.3. Project groups work.
16.3. Project groups work.
23.3. Interrim seminar 8.15-11.30
30.3. Project groups work.
6.4. 10.00-11.30 Project managers and teachers meet.
13.4. Project groups work työskentelevät
20.4. Project groups work työskentelevät
27.4. 10.00-11.30 Project managers and teachers meet.
5.5. Project groups work.
11.5. Project groups work.
18.5.22 Final seminar (preparations 12.30-13, 13-16 seminar)

Further information

Changes may take place.

Evaluation scale

H-5

Assessment methods and criteria

- results of the project
- project reporting
* evaluation from the working life partner
* self evaluation of the group and its´members
* teacher´s evaluation

Return all reporting latest 1.6.22 (second returnment day 17.6.22).

Assessment criteria, fail (0)

- assignment not completed
- reporting missing

Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

- assignment completed but the contractor is not satisfied with the results.
- the project group fail to work effectively as a team
- the team is not committed to the work
- the group does not use teachers´ / contractor´s guidance
- the report is inadequate.

Assessment criteria, good (3-4)

- assignment completed and the contractor is satisfied with the results.
- the project group works effectively as a team
- the team is committed to the work
- the group uses teachers´ / contractor´s guidance
- the report is informative.

Assessment criteria, excellent (5)

- assignment completed and the contractor is very satisfied with the results.
- innovative performance throughout the process
- the project group works effectively as a team
- the team is committed to the work
- the group uses teachers´ / contractor´s guidance
- the report is excellent.