Tandem Learning and Culture (5 cr)
Code: 3011564-3001
General information
- Enrollment
- 03.07.2019 - 04.09.2019
- Registration for the implementation has ended.
- Timing
- 02.08.2019 - 23.12.2019
- Implementation has ended.
- Number of ECTS credits allocated
- 5 cr
- Local portion
- 5 cr
- Mode of delivery
- Contact learning
- Unit
- Engineering and Business
- Campus
- Salo IoT Campus
- Teaching languages
- English
- Degree programmes
- Degree Programme in Business
- Teachers
- Pia Lindgren
- Course
- 3011564
Evaluation scale
H-5
Content scheduling
2.9-20.12.2019
Learning two languages and cultures, Finnish plus foreign
examples: shopping, cooking, parties, daily life, sports, hobbies, experiences
results presented in an event/portfolio/poster/video/website or similar
Actual implementations can decided by the tandem-pair/team. The main idea is mutual learning in each other's languages and cultural habits .Students should meet regularly and set goals for the learning process. Supportive literature should be as reference. Meetings can take place in various locations and situations: the more versatile, the better
Objective
x
Content
teaching and learning two languages and cultures, Finnish plus foreignexamples: shopping, cooking, parties, daily life, sports, hobbies, experiencesresults presented in an event
Materials
to be chosen and applied acc students
some theoretical material should be viewed and included in portfolio
Teaching methods
experiential learning in intercultural settings
Exam schedules
no exams, learning is reported in various other ways
Pedagogic approaches and sustainable development
Innovation pedagogy in international encounters, learning in teams and by experiences,
sharing the learning
Completion alternatives
-
Student workload
5 cr equals to 135 h of student work
Evaluation methods and criteria
Each tandem-pair should document the meetings somehow and present the process in the way they choose (event, fair, blog, vlog, poster, drama etc)
Supportive literature should be included as reference
continuous self, peer and coach feedback (motorola model)
final evalation done by coach
Failed (0)
no or very litte reported activity
very limited reporting of the activities
no theoretical reflection
not enough evidence of the learning process
not enough working hours
Assessment criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
to get a pass, each tandem-pair/tem should have documentation and time-monitoring of their meetings, activities etc. Final presentation is also required
Assessment criteria, good (3-4)
Documentation is versatile with details and in-depth analysis on the learning. References to theories included and discussed
Time-monitoring done accurately
Assessment criteria, excellent (5)
Documentation is analytical . Learning is more goal-oriented
Acitivities include also motivation to deeper understanding and witness about effort taken
References to literature are more academic
Further information
-